Saunderson against Marr

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date17 November 1788
Date17 November 1788
CourtCourt of Common Pleas

English Reports Citation: 126 E.R. 46

IN THE COURTS OF COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER CHAMBER

Saunderson against Marr

saunderson against mark. Monday, Nov. 17th, 1788. A warrant of attorney given by an infant is absolutely void, and the Court will not confirm it, though the infant appear to have given it (knowing that it was not valid), for the purpose of collusion (a)1. The defendant being an infant, joined with his brother in giving a warrant of attorney to the plaintiff, to confess a judgment, which was accordingly entered up, and the defendant taken in execution. In order to procure his discharge, he alone gave a second warrant of attorney, on which judgment was again entered, and he again taken in execution. On this, a rule was granted to shew cause, why the last judgment should not be set aside, and the warrant of attorney cancelled, on the ground that the defendant was an infant at the time of giving it. Marshall, Serjt., shewed for cause, a declaration of the defendant, when he gave the second warrant of attorney, that he would take no advantage of his infancy, a promise to pay the debt, and some circumstances of collusion between him and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
36 cases
  • Ex parte Van der Spuy, NO
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...te vervang. In Ex parte Haworth, N.O., 1946 K.P.A. 679, is een klousule gelees asof die woord 'not' per abuis uitgelaat is. Steyn sê op bl. 75: E 'The authorities seen clear that if on the grounds of mistake some clause or disposition contained in the document is really not a part of the wi......
  • Netherlands Insurance Co of SA Ltd v Van der Vyver
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...van 'that kind of B harm'. Sien Pollock, Torts, 15de uitg., bl. 112, aangehaal deur FAGAN, A.R., in Lampert v Hefer, supra te bl. 512. Op bl. 75 van hul werk, 'Die Onregmatige Daad in die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg' van van der Merwe en Olivier, sê hulle: '. . . dat vir opset word tog slegs geëis ......
  • Ex parte Van der Spuy, NO
    • South Africa
    • Transvaal Provincial Division
    • 20 April 1966
    ...te vervang. In Ex parte Haworth, N.O., 1946 K.P.A. 679, is een klousule gelees asof die woord 'not' per abuis uitgelaat is. Steyn sê op bl. 75: E 'The authorities seen clear that if on the grounds of mistake some clause or disposition contained in the document is really not a part of the wi......
  • Roux v Schreuder
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...is, sien Barnabas Plein & Co v Sol Jacobson & Son, 1968 (3) SA p618 1928 AD 25 op bl. 31; West Witwatersrand Areas Ltd v Roos, 1936 AD 62 op bl. 75. Die term soos dit staan is reeds in daardie vorm een met 'business efficacy' al sou dit verstandig of wenslik wees (uit die A verkoper se oogp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Book Reviews
    • South Africa
    • South African Journal of Economics No. 47-3, September 1979
    • 1 September 1979
    ...hierdie werk mis 'n mens op talryke plekke die bepalende lidwoord.Ek noem net enkele voorbeelde. In Afrikaans moedig ons "die personeel" aan (bl. 75), verhoog ons "die produktiwiteit" (bll. 76 en78), styg "die jaarlikse verkope" van iets (bll. 83 en 84). Daar is verder die lelike "verwysery......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT