Savage against Foster

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1795
Date01 January 1795
CourtHigh Court

English Reports Citation: 88 E.R. 299

IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH, CHANCERY, COMMOM PLEAS, AND EXCHEQUER.

savage against Foster

Distinguished, Nicholl v. Jones, 1866, L. E. 3 Eq. 709. Applied, Sharpe v. Foy, 1868, L. R. 4 Ch. 41. See In re Lush's Trusts, 1869, L. R. 4 Ch. 596; In re M'Intyre's Trustees' Estate, 1888, 21 L. R. Ir. 432; Bell v. Marsh [1903], 1 Ch. 533. See also 2 Wh. & T. L. C. 1877 (5th ed.), 620.

9 MOD. 36. TRINITY TERM, 9 GEO. 1. IN CHANCERY 299 case 18. savage against foster. [Distinguished, Nicholl v. Jmm, 1866, L. E. 3 Eq. 709. Applied, Sharpe v. Foi/, 1868, L. R. 4 Ch. 41. See In re Lush's Trusts, 1869, L. E. 4 Ch. 596; In re M'Myre's Trustees' Estate, 1888, 21 L. R. Ir. 432 ; Bell v. Marsh [1903], 1 Ch. 533. See also 2 Wh. & T. L. C. 1877 (5th ed.), 620.] Where a person knowing his own title, and not giving notice of it to a purchaser, shall never set it up against the purchaser. Margaret Smith being seised of the lands in question, upon her marriage with Peter Flavill settled the same upon trustees and their heirs, to the use of the said Peter Flavill for life, then upon Margaret his intended wife for life ; remainder, after the death of the said Peter and Margaret, to the heirs of the said Peter, on the body of the said Margaret to be begotten; remainder to the right heirs of the said Margaret for ever. The said Peter and Margaret had issue only one daughter, the now defendant, who was married to one Foster.-Peter Flavill died, and then his widow married one Brown, by whom she had issue one other daughter, and no more ; which daughter being courted by one Williams, but he refusing to marry her without such a fortune, which Margaret her mother was not able to give without breaking through this settlement, conveyed the said lands to the aforesaid Williams, &c. ; and the defendant Mrs. Foster, and her husband, who knew that the lands were settled on her in tail as aforesaid, solicited her mother Margaret Brown to make a conveyance in favour of the said Williams, and were assisting in carrying on the marriage between him and her half-sister Brown. [36] Whereupon the said Margaret conveyed these lands, &o. to the use of herself for life, remainder to Williams and his heirs; then the marriage took effect; and afterwards Williams sold these lands to the plaintiff Savage, who entered and built an house thereon. And now Mrs. Foster, who was the issue in tail by virtue of the said settlement, and endeavouring to set it up against the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Jackson way Properties Ltd v Smith and Others
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 21 July 2023
    ...or claim as against such other party on any subsequent occasion.” The authors cite several authorities, including Savage v Foster (1723) 9 Mod. Rep. 35 at 37 also Gregg v Wells (1839) 10 Ad. & El. 90 where Littledale J. stated at p. 96: “…a party who culpably and negligently stands by, and ......
  • Cahill v Martin
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 2 March 1881
    ...1 H. L. C. 538. Barrow v. BarrowENR 4 K. & J. 419. Barrow v. Barrow Ibid. 415. Gretton v. Howard 1 Swanst. 413, 416. Savage v. FosterENR 9 Mod. 35. Vansittart v. VansittartENR 4 K. & J. 70. Williams v. BailyELR L. R. 2 Eq. 731. Wall v. RogersELR L. R. 9 Eq. 58. Wilton v. Hill 25 L. J. Ch. 1......
  • Mo Ying v Brillex Development Ltd And Another
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 15 April 2015
    ...in him not to give notice of his title to the intended purchaser, and in such cases infancy…shall be no excuse.’: see Savage v Foster (1723) 9 Mod Rep 35, 37 (see also Spiro v Lintern [1973] 1 WLR 1002, 3) Discussion 8.3 The Judge’s reasoning has semblance (although not entirely) of the rea......
  • The Estate of Campbell Gaussen and The Rev Thomas Jones Trustees for Sale Under The Will of Elizabeth M'Intyre, Owners and Petitioners
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 13 January 1888
    ...2 Drew. 165, 363. Cahill v. MartinUNKUNK 5 L. R. Ir. 227; 7 L. R. Ir. 361. Cahill v. CahillELR 8 App. Cas. 420. Savage v. FosterENR 9 Mod. 35. Cahill v. CahillELR 8 App. Cas. 420. Sharpe v. FoyELR L. R. 4 Ch. App. 35. Nicholl v. JonesELR L. R. 3 Eq. 696. Bainbrigge v. Brown 18 Ch. Div. 188.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT