Scots Law News

AuthorScott Wortley,Hector L MacQueen
DOI10.3366/elr.2011.0056
Published date01 September 2011
Date01 September 2011
Pages343-351
Lord Rodger of Earlsferry (18 September 1944–26 June 2011)

Sad news of the death of Lord Rodger of Earlsferry on 26 June 2011. He had been ill with the effects of a brain tumour since the early spring.

Alan Rodger was the greatest Scots lawyer of his generation as well as a highly distinguished scholar with an academic publications record that any full-time professor would have been proud of. And he was a highly stimulating and entertaining social companion. He would have mocked the cliché, but he has been taken from us while still at the height of his remarkable powers.

The bare facts of Alan's glitteringly varied career can be simply told. He was born and educated in Glasgow (Kelvinside Academy, Glasgow University) before moving to take a DPhil in Roman Law at Oxford under the supervision of Professor David Daube (previously of Aberdeen). Daube became the most significant intellectual influence on Alan's thinking about and approach to law in general. The DPhil thesis, published in 1972 as Owners and Neighbours in Roman Law, led first to a Junior Research Fellowship at Balliol and then to a Fellowship at New College, Oxford from 1970, during which time he began to publish on Scots as well as Roman law. One of his articles then was cited in argument in a Scottish court but dismissed by the judge as written by one who had no right of appearance before him (Mercantile Credit v Townsley 1971 SLT (Sh Ct) 37 at 39). Perhaps in answer, in 1974 Alan was called to the Scottish Bar, becoming as soon as 1976 Clerk of Faculty (a position he held for three years). He was appointed QC and an Advocate Depute in 1985, and then became successively Solicitor General for Scotland in 1989 and Lord Advocate in 1992 under the then Conservative Government.

Amidst all this, his academic achievements led to his election as a Fellow of the British Academy in 1991 and as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1992. He ascended the Scottish bench in 1995 and in 1996 succeeded Lord Hope of Craighead as Lord President and Lord Justice General. In 2001 he joined Lord Hope as one of the two Scottish judges in the House of Lords; and when that court was transformed into the UK Supreme Court in October 2009 the two became the first Scottish Justices in that institution. Although he never lost touch with the Scottish university law schools (for example, he was an Honorary Professor at Glasgow, and received honorary degrees from Edinburgh and Aberdeen as well as Glasgow again), he loved Oxford, becoming for example the university's High Steward in 2008 and Visitor of Balliol (in succession to the late Lord Bingham) in late 2010 as well as helping out with the teaching of Roman law in the university after the death of the Regius Professor of Civil Law, Peter Birks, in 2004.

As a judge Alan was in the forefront in what has turned out to be the greatest challenge ever to face the courts, not only in Scotland but also in the United Kingdom as a whole: the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 coupled with, in this jurisdiction, the Scotland Act of the same year. While some of his analyses and conclusions may be challenged by others on legal and (for Alan, irrelevantly) political grounds, there can be no doubt of the rigour and vigour which he with others brought to what turned out to be an enormous and far-reaching task. Cadder v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 43, 2010 SLT 1125 was perhaps his last major contribution in this area, and a very typical one for those looking for an example of his judicial style. But the contribution was not limited to this field, however central it seems. There were path-breaking judgments in pure criminal law, as in Galbraith v HM Advocate 2002 JC 1 on diminished responsibility. And in private law he ranged widely, perhaps especially when he was Lord President; but even in the House of Lords and the Supreme Court there were powerful, possibly decisive speeches and judgments: for example on the right of retention in Inveresk plc v Tullis Russell Papermakers [2010] UKSC 19, 2010 SC (UKSC) 106, where he explained clearly the notion that the right was subject in some circumstances to the equitable control of the court; the servitude of parking case Moncrieff v Jamieson [2007] UKHL 42, 2008 SC (HL) 1 (with its entertaining discussions of parking problems in ancient Rome and contemporary tenemental Scottish cities); and the effect on the buyer's right of rejection of faulty goods of acceptance of the seller's offer of cure in J & H Ritchie Ltd v Lloyd Ltd [2007] UKHL 9, 2007 SC (HL) 89.

Alan eschewed any form of “legal nationalism”, indeed could be fiercely critical of some of its manifestations. Some of that can be seen in his Wilson Lecture of 1995, later published as the very first article in the Edinburgh Law Review: “Thinking about Scots law” (1996) 1 EdinLR 3; but at various points in his judicial career he did not hesitate to develop a distinctive Scots law where he found it to be justified by authority, principle and legal policy: notably the law of unjustified enrichment (Shilliday v Smith 1998 SC 725), but also the entitlement of a contracting party to claim specific implement (Highland and Universal Properties Ltd v Safeway Properties Ltd 2000 SC 297) in circumstances in which in England the House of Lords had held specific performance not to be available. His judgments were peppered with references to Roman law, on the use of which as a source for modern Scots law he had characteristically specific and strong views, but without ever...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT