Scott v Clare

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date27 May 1812
Date27 May 1812
CourtHigh Court

English Reports Citation: 170 E.R. 1366

IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS

Scott
and
Clare

Wednesday, May 27, 1812. scott v. clare. (To prove that the plaintiff was discharged under an insolvent Act after the cause of actaen accrued and before action brought, it is not enough to give in evidence a parol acknowledgment by him , but the clerk of the peace should be called, ami the order o sessions produced to shew the regularity of the discharge.) Goods sold.-Plea, the general issue One defence set up was, that the plaintiff had been discharged under an insolvent debtor's Act after the cause of action had accrued, and before the action was brought. -To prove the discharge, the defendant's counsel proposed to give in evidence a verbal acknowledgment by the plaintiff himself, upon the question being put to him.^But 3 CAMP 237. OVIKGTON V. BELL 1367 Lord Eilenborough said this was insufficient, as the discharge might be irregular and void, and the plaintiff might be mistaken , and that to prove a judicial...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Nagle v Shea
    • Ireland
    • Court of Exchequer Chamber (Ireland)
    • 29 April 1875
    ...5 M. & Gr. 204. Collins v.Bayntun 1 Q. B. 117. Weatherston v. EdgingtonENR 2 Camp. 94. Gillet v.Abbott 7 A. & E. 783. Scott v. ClareENR 3 Camp. 236. Summersett v. AdamsonENR 1 Bing. 73. Mason v. JohnstonENR 1 Esp. 89. Smithwick v. BearyUNK 3 Ir. Jur. (O. S.) 333; 1 Ir. C. L. R. 344. Vacher ......
  • Deering v Palmer
    • Ireland
    • Court of Common Pleas (Ireland)
    • 7 June 1842
    ...Pleas. DEERING and PALMER. Hall v. RocheENR 8 T. R. 187. Rankin v. HornerENR 16 East, 191. Scott v. ClareENR 3 Camp. 236. Tracy v. BlakeENR 1 M. & W. 168. Slatteri v. PooleyENR 6 M. & W. 664. Woodward v. LarkingENR 3 Esp. 286. CASES AT LAW. 421 T. T. 1842. CommonPleas. DEERING v. PALMER, Ju......
  • R v Williams
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court
    • 4 August 1835
    ...for embezzlement, and (a) This plea was pleaded before the rules of H. T 4 Will IV. came into operation. (b) The easefof Scott v. Clare, 3 Camp. 236. 6 OAB. t P. 8S7. REX V. CARLILE 1393 the indictment contain only one count, charging the receipt of a gross sum on a particular day, if it tu......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT