Scott v Scott

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1912
Year1912
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v VW and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Court
    • 1 January 2022
  • Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v VW & Ors
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Court
    • 18 October 2022
    ...concessions), Re [1999] 2 FLR 728, CA. Oxfordshire County Council v DP & Ors[2005] EWHC 1593 (Fam), [2005] 2 FLR 1031. Scott v Scott [1912] P 241, Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council v D [1995] 1 FLR 873. X (Court of Protection practice), Re[2015] EWCA Civ 599, [2016] 1 WLR 227, [2016] 1......
  • The King (on the application of MNL) v Westminster Magistrates' Court
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 17 March 2023
    ...Act 1960. There is no secrecy attaching to such a proceeding heard in chambers (“in private” in the modern language): see Scott v Scott [1912] P 241 per Fletcher Moulton LJ (later vindicated in the House of Lords) and Hodgson v Imperial Tobacco Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 1056 at 1071 per Lord Woolf ......
  • Ijeoma Nkem Egeneonu v Levi Egeneonu
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 18 January 2017
    ...intent. A related point 36 There is a related point which can best be made by reference to what Lord Atkinson said in the great case of Scott v Scott. One of the issues in that case was whether the alleged contempt, assuming it was contempt at all, was criminal or civil, for at that time se......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 53-1, February 1989
    • 1 February 1989
    ...for breach of a court's order made in the course of a civiltrial, that application is not a criminal cause or matter. In Scott v.Scott [1912] P. 241, it was said that this is because disobedience tosuch an order is not a criminal act.Ifthis be correct, clearly nocriminal proceedings can fol......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT