Scriven v Jescott (Leeds) Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1908 |
| Date | 1908 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Jonathan Alexander Ltd v Proctor
...agreed). It has also been said that a company is not in the same position as a litigant in person ( Scriven v Jescott (Leeds) Ltd (1908) 53 Sol J 101 per Bray J). Against that background, it is, to my mind highly improbable, that without any indication that Parliament intended the term "lit......
- Arbuthnot Leasing International Ltd v Havelet Leasing Ltd and Others
-
Gabriel Coffey v Tara Mines Ltd
...(EX TEMPORE) S (A) (ORSE B (A)) v B (R) 2002 2 IR 428 2001 21 5790 MANNIX LTD, IN RE 1984 NZLR 309 SCRIVEN v JESCOTT (LEEDS) LTD 1908 53 SJ 101 LONDON TRAMWAYS COMPANY v LONDON CO COUNCIL 1898 AC 375 13 TLR 254 FRINTON & WALTON URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL v WALTON & DISTRICT SAND & MINERAL CO L......
- Molnar Engineering Pty Ltd v Burns
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Legal Practitioner
...Frinton & Walton U.D.C. v. Walton & District Sand & Mineral Co. Ltd. & Or. (1938) I All E.R. 640 and Scriven v. Vescott (Leeds) Ltd . (1908) 53 Sol. JO.101.” – Per Belgore, J.S.C. in Atake v. Afejuku Suit No. LCD 31/90; (1994) 9 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 368) 379 at 416. 1651. Litigant’s duty to monito......