Seabridge Shipping A.B. v A.C. Orssleff's Eftf's A/S (Fjellvang)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1999
Year1999
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v Impregilo SpA
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 30 Junio 2005
    ...to interpret the 1996 Act in the light of pre-existing case law? Clearly not. In Seabridge Shipping AB v AC Orssleff's EFtF's A/S [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 685, 690 Thomas J (now Thomas LJ), a judge with enormous experience in this field, made valuable observations on which I cannot improve. He......
  • Taylor Woodrow Construction v RMD Kwikform Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 17 Abril 2008
    ...for the purposes of section 14(1). 22 He relies upon the judgment of Thomas J (as he then was) in Seabridge Shipping AB v AC Orssleff's Eftf's S/A [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 685 at 689 to 690 as showing that Section 14 is to interpreted broadly and flexibly. 23 Mr Bartlett also refers to Section......
  • Elektrim SA v Vivendi Universal SA [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 20 Marzo 2007
    ...in arbitrations. 7 Thirdly, he endorsed the view (previously expressed by Thomas J in Seabridge AB v AC Orssleff's Eftf's AS [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 685 at 690) that the Act should be interpreted without reference to the pre-existing law on arbitration, unless the Act did not cover a specific ......
  • Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi as v Sometal Sal
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 18 Enero 2012
    ...is, thus, not incorporated by language which refers to all terms: The Federal Bulker; or all conditions: The Varenna; see also The Delos [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 685. (c) Arbitration clauses oust the jurisdiction of the courts and clear words are need for that purpose: Lord Gorrell and Lord Rob......
  • Get Started for Free