Seabridge Shipping A.B. v A.C. Orssleff's Eftf's A/S (Fjellvang)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
Lesotho Highlands Development Authority v Impregilo SpA
...to interpret the 1996 Act in the light of pre-existing case law? Clearly not. In Seabridge Shipping AB v AC Orssleff's EFtF's A/S [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 685, 690 Thomas J (now Thomas LJ), a judge with enormous experience in this field, made valuable observations on which I cannot improve. He......
-
Taylor Woodrow Construction v RMD Kwikform Ltd
...a sufficient agreement for the purposes of section 14(1). 22 He relies upon the judgment of Thomas J (as he then was) in Seabridge Shipping AB v AC Orssleff's Eftf's S/A [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 685 at 689 to 690 as showing that Section 14 is to interpreted broadly and flexibly. 23 Mr Bartlett......
-
Golden Endurance Shipping SA v Rma Watanya SA and Others
...out its content, as a clause which incorporates the Hague Rules (see The Agios Lazarus [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep 47 and Seabridge Shipping AB v AC Orssleff's Eftf's A/S [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 685, the only issue having been what the impact of this would be on the Hague-Visby Rules, a point that wo......
-
(1) Finmoon Ltd (2) OOO "Megafruit" v (1) Baltic Reefers Management Ltd (2) Howell Trading Sa and Others
...of the relevant dispute has been commenced: see The Agios Lazaros [1976] QB 933; Seabridge Shipping AB v AC Orsslef's Eftf's A/S [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 685; Taylor Woodrow Construction v RMD Kwikform Ltd [2008] 2 Lloyd's Rep 345. In Seabridge Shipping, Mr Justice Thomas held: "Section 14 s......
Request a trial to view additional results