Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Judgment Date1976
Year1976
Date1976

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
515 cases
4 books & journal articles
  • The Constitution and the Substantive Principles of Judicial Review: The Full Scope of the Entrenched Minimum Provision of Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...(La tham CJ). 154 (2010) 240 CLR 611, 620 (citing Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [1977] AC 1014), 621 (citing Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391, 419-20, 453), 623 (citing Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxati......
  • Judicial Review: Recent Trends
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 29-3, September 2001
    • 1 September 2001
    ...agreeing).141 (1995) 4 NSWLR 139, 156.142 (1986) 70 ALR 147, 155-157.143 Paras 41, 42 and 43.144 Para 22, set out in 70 ALR, 156 (10).145 [1977] AC 1014 (HL).146 [1977] AC 1047 388 Federal Law Review Volume 29__________________________________________________________________________________......
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2003, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...SLR 120. Nevertheless, the formulation of the test in Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council[1977] AC 1014 at 1047 (followed in Re Fong Thin Choo) that the court may consider whether the relevant decision-maker has undertaken a ‘proper self-dire......
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2002, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...he followed the reasoning of Lord Wilberforce in Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council[1977] AC 1014 at 1047. The subjectively worded s 37(6) did not require the Commander to hold an inquiry or hearing before revoking a licence in the interest ......