Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Tjolle and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date02 May 1997
Date02 May 1997
CourtChancery Division

Chancery Division

Before Mr Justice Jacob

Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
and
Tjolle and Others

Directors - disqualification - whether public interest likely to be served

Purpose of disqualifying directors

The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry should consider whether the public interest was served by pressing on with an application for the disqualification of a company director when the period of disqualification was likely to be low and the case had been significantly delayed through no fault of the respondent.

Any public interest involved in a disqualification might be outweighed by the de facto disqualification which was often the result of pending proceedings and the legal costs involved in going through with the procedure.

Mr Justice Jacob sitting in the Chancery Division so stated when dismissing the secretary of state's application for an order under section 6 of the Company Directors' Disqualification Act 1986 against the third respondent, Diana Kenning. The first and second respondents to the application were Valere Nikolas Frederick Tjolle and Theresa Evelyn McDermott.

Mr Stephen Davies for the secretary of state; Mrs Kenning in person.

MR JUSTICE JACOB said that Land Travel Ltd, a holiday company, went into voluntary liquidation in July 1992 with an estimated deficiency in respect of unsecured creditors of £12.4 million, including £6.6 million of lost deposits paid by members of the public for future holidays.

The Fraud Squad seized the company's records.

Mr Tjolle owned 999 and Mrs McDermott owned one of the 1,000 issued shares in the company's holding company. Following the appointment of liquidators and the bankruptcy of Mr Tjolle, he pleaded guilty to fraudulent trading and was sentenced to nine months imprisonment and disqualified from being a company director for 10 years.

The secretary of state was of the opinion that Mr Tjolle's conduct merited the maximum possible period of disqualification under the Act, namely 15 years.

His Lordship said that it was highly desirable that criminal courts should be aware of the sentencing guidelines laid down by the Court of Appeal inIn re Sevenoaks Stationers (Retail) LtdELR ([1991] Ch 164).

Civil and criminal courts should apply the same standards. The purpose of disqualification, to protect the public from the activities of those unfit to be concerned in company management, was the same in both courts.

The period of disqualification was perhaps not always seen...

To continue reading

Request your trial
47 cases
5 books & journal articles
  • Application of the company directors disqualification act 1986
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Law of Insolvent Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships Contents
    • 29 August 2015
    ...Accountants Educational Trust, 1998), p 123. In addition, as noted by Jacob J in Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Tjolle [1998] 1 BCLC 333 at 340, the costs imposed in disqualification cases can exceed any fine which would be imposed in criminal proceedings. 52 Prior to the statu......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Law of Insolvent Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships Contents
    • 29 August 2015
    ...Indonesia [2001] EWCA Civ 1696 64, 82 Sea Voyager Maritime Inc v Bielski [1999] 1 BCLC 133 82 Secretary for Trade and Industry v Tjolle [1998] BCC 282, [1998] 1 BCLC 333 17, 581 Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Arnold [2007] EWHC 1933 (Ch), [2008] BCC 119 165 xxxiv Law of Insolve......
  • Introduction
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Law of Insolvent Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships Contents
    • 29 August 2015
    ...62 [2014] EWCA Civ 939, [2015] 1 WLR 189 at [33]–[45] per Arden LJ. See also Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Tjolle [1998] BCC 282 at 290 per Jacob J. 63 See, in relation to de facto directors, Ultraframe (UK) Ltd v Fielding and Others [2005] EWHC 1638 (Ch), [2006] FSR 17 at [12......
  • The Regulation of Shadow Directors
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...(original emphasis).60Idem at 260-1.61The Ultraframe case supra note 11 in par 1255; Secretary of State for Tradeand Industry v Tjolle[1998] 1 BCLC 333 at 343; Re Canadian Land Reclaiming and Colonizing Co (1880) LR 14 ChD 660(CA) at 670.62C Noonan & S Watson ‘The Nature of Shadow Directors......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT