Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v JS

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Neutral Citation[2010] UKUT 240 (AAC)
Date2010
Year2010
CourtUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • JM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (CA)
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 27 September 2018
    ...State for Work and Pensions (CA) [2018] UKUT 329 (AAC) 13. The claimant refers to Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v JS (IS) [2010] UKUT 240 (AAC) for the proposition that self-employment “is not confined to periods of actual work”, although it is conceded that that case arose under......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2022-05-05, [2022] UKUT 00157 (IAC) (Sohrab and Others (continued household membership))
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 5 May 2022
    ...income, in the context of her only doing “some” sewing work. Mr Jegede’s reliance on Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v JS [2010] UKUT 240 (AAC) is nothing to the point as it concerns the impact of an apparent cessation of self-employed activities by a person who previously enjoyed ......
  • Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v HD and GP (CHB)
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 12 January 2017
    ...actively engaged in economic activity at every moment in order to maintain self-employment. As Judge Jacobs put it in SSWP v JS (IS) [2010] UKUT 240 (AAC): “5. I do not accept that a claimant who is for the moment doing no work is necessarily no longer self-employed. There will commonly be ......
  • N v Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (CHB)
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • Invalid date
    ...questions are to be determined on the evidence in each particular case (Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v JS (IS) [2010] UKUT 240 (AAC); HMRC v HD [2017] UKUT (AAC)). The fact that a service is effected for consideration may be compelling evidence that the remuneration element of the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT