Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v JS
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Neutral Citation | [2010] UKUT 240 (AAC) |
Date | 2010 |
Year | 2010 |
Court | Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
JM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (CA)
...State for Work and Pensions (CA) [2018] UKUT 329 (AAC) 13. The claimant refers to Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v JS (IS) [2010] UKUT 240 (AAC) for the proposition that self-employment “is not confined to periods of actual work”, although it is conceded that that case arose under......
-
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2022-05-05, [2022] UKUT 00157 (IAC) (Sohrab and Others (continued household membership))
...income, in the context of her only doing “some” sewing work. Mr Jegede’s reliance on Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v JS [2010] UKUT 240 (AAC) is nothing to the point as it concerns the impact of an apparent cessation of self-employed activities by a person who previously enjoyed ......
-
Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v HD and GP (CHB)
...actively engaged in economic activity at every moment in order to maintain self-employment. As Judge Jacobs put it in SSWP v JS (IS) [2010] UKUT 240 (AAC): “5. I do not accept that a claimant who is for the moment doing no work is necessarily no longer self-employed. There will commonly be ......
-
N v Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (CHB)
...questions are to be determined on the evidence in each particular case (Secretary of State for Work & Pensions v JS (IS) [2010] UKUT 240 (AAC); HMRC v HD [2017] UKUT (AAC)). The fact that a service is effected for consideration may be compelling evidence that the remuneration element of the......
Request a trial to view additional results