Selby v Whitbread & Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1917
Year1917
Date1917
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • Ken Power v Raheel Shah
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 March 2023
    ...and the surveyors had jurisdiction over the matters contained in that notice and in the notice given by the adjoining owner.” 69 In Selby v Whitbread & Co [1917] 1 KB 736 a building owner had served a party structure notice under the London Building Act 1894 as a precursor to rebuilding hi......
  • Kaye v Lawrence
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 26 October 2010
    ...Act. 57 I was referred to two decisions which deal with aspects of rights under predecessor provisions of the 1996 Act. First, in Selby v Whitbread & Co [1917] 1 K.B. 736, McCardie J had to deal with a question of whether common law rights of support co-existed with the provisions of the Lo......
  • African Fertilizers and Chemicals NIG Ltd (Nigeria) v Shipsnavo GmbH & Company Reederei KG [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 29 September 2011
    ...dismiss the defendant's application. 1 The others are Merrifield Ziegler Co. v Liverpool Cotton Association Ltd. (1911) 105 LT 97 and Selby v Whitbread [1917] 1 KB 2 Since Slade J's decision the ECJ has confirmed that what is relevant to registration and recognition of a judgment is its en......
  • The London Steam-Ship Owners' Mutual Insurance Association Ltd v The Kingdom of Spain
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 November 2021
    ...awards granting declarations of rights or specific performance illustrate the remedial flexibility of the enforcing court. Thus, in Selby v Whitbread, when the defendant company demolished a building, withdrawing support from the plaintiff's adjoining building and rendering it dangerous, su......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The future of prescriptive easements in Australia and England.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 31 No. 1, April 2007
    • 1 April 2007
    ...eg, Lemaitre v Davis (1881) 19 Ch D 281, 290 (Hall V-C); Waddington v Naylor (1889) LT 480, 482 (Chitty J); Selby v Whitbread & Co [1917] 1 KB 736, 751-2 (McCardie (88) See generally Peter Butt, Land Law (5th ed, 2006) 451-60. (89) See, eg, Piromalli v Di Masi [1980] WAR 173, 178 (Wickh......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT