Selkirk v Romar Investments Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1963
Date1963
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 cases
  • Chay Chong Hwa and Others v Seah Mary
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 27 October 1986
  • Chay Chong Hwa and Others v Seah Mary
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 24 May 1984
    ...imputed to the vendor as at all in the nature even of recklessness, much less of fraud or dishonesty. Selkirk v Romar Investments, Ltd [1963] 3 All ER 994 is another case where a condition of sale similar to condition 5 was invoked by the vendor to rescind the contract and the Judicial Comm......
  • Flowers Development Company Ltd v The Bahamas Telecommunications Company Ltd
    • Bahamas
    • Court of Appeal (Bahamas)
    • 29 November 2022
    ...and Law of Property Act, section 3(3) as interpreted in the Privy Council decision of Selkirk v Romar Investment Authorities [1963] 3 All ER 994; the Court of Appeal decision of Bodie v Bahamas Land and Finance Company Limited [ 1979–801 1 LRB and the Supreme Court decision of Helen EI Ree......
  • Jobern Pty Ltd v Breakfree Resorts (Victoria) Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Termination For Convenience
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 5 August 2013
    ...On the Compass approach, that power would not therefore be circumscribed in any way. However, in Selkirk v Romar Investments Ltd [1963] 1 WLR 1415, the Privy Council considered a situation in which the vendor of land exercised his contractual right to rescind on the basis that he was "unabl......
6 books & journal articles
  • Specific Performance: Sale of Land
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 November 2023
    ...and did not amount to acting in good faith. 180 175 See Louch v Pape Avenue Land Co , [1928] SCR 518; Selkirk v Romar Investments Ltd , [1963] 1 WLR 1415 (PC). 176 3999581 Canada , above note 168 at para. 25. 177 Toth v Ho (1998), 26 RPR (3d) 76; Business Development Insurance Ltd v Caledon......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 November 2023
    ...BCJ No 1491 (CA) ......................................................... 204 Table of Cases 775 Selkirk v Romar Investments Ltd, [1963] 1 WLR 1415, [1963] 3 All ER 994, 107 Sol J 907 (PC) ...................................................... 526 Semchyshen v Semchyshen, 2016 SKCA 108 .........
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Equitable Remedies. Second Edition
    • 18 June 2013
    ...(1982), 42 B.C.L.R. 1, 33 C.P.C. 42, [1982] B.C.J. No. 1491 (C.A.) .......................... 131 Selkirk v. Romar Investments Ltd., [1963] 1 W.L.R. 1415, [1963] 3 All E.R. 994, 107 Sol. J. 907 (P.C.) ................................................ 375 Semelhago v. Paramadevan, [1996] 2 S.......
  • Specific Performance: Sale of Land
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Equitable Remedies. Second Edition
    • 18 June 2013
    ...Ltd. , above note 110 at para. 20. 116 See Louch v. Pape Avenue Land Co ., [1928] S.C.R. 518; and Selkirk v. Romar Investments Ltd. , [1963] 1 W.L.R. 1415 (P.C.). 117 3999581 Canada Ltd. v. 1394734 Ontario Ltd. , above note 110 at para. 25. 118 Mason v. Freedman , [1958] S.C.R. 483 at 486, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT