Septimus Pruen, Appellant, John Surman Cox, Respondent
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 13 November 1845 |
| Date | 13 November 1845 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 135 E.R. 839
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
S. C. 1 Lutw. Reg. Cas. 304; Barr. & Arn. 514; 15 L. J. C. P. 17; 9 Jur. 994.
COMMON BENCH REPORTS. CASES ARGUED and DETERMINED in the COURT of COMMON PLEAS, in Michaelmas Term and Vacation, 1845, and Hilary Term and Yacation, and Easter Term, 1846. By JAMES MANNING, Serjeant at Law; T. C. GRANGER, of the Inner Temple, Esq., Barrister at Law; and JOHN SCOTT, of the Inner Temple, Esq., Barrister at Law. Vol. II. London, 1847. [1] cases upon appeal from the decisions of revising barristers, argued and determined in the court of common pleas, in michaelmas term and vacation, hilary term and vacation, and easter term, in the ninth year of the keign of victoria. eastern division of gloucestershire. septimus pruen, Appellant, john surman Cox, Respondent. Nov. 13, 1845. [S. C. 1 Lutw. Keg. Cas. 304; Barr. & Arn. 514; 15 L. J. C. P. 17; 9 Jur. 994.] In a notice of objection, the objector described himself as of "No. 398 High Street, Cheltenham, on the register of voters for the parish of Cirencester." On the register so referred to the objector was described as of " Cheltenham" only :-Held, that the notice was sufficient. The notice of objection was duly given, and was in proper form; but the objector described his place of abode as " No. 398 High Street, Cheltenham," and " on the register of voters for the parish of Cirencester." The name of the objector was on the list (a) [2] of voters for the parish of Cirencester, in the said division; but the place of abode, as described in that list, was ' Cheltenham " only. Cheltenham is a parish within the said division, and No. 398 High Street, is within the said parish of Cheltenham, and is the true place of abode of the objector. It was contended, that the objector ought to have omitted No. 398 High Street, in the description of his place of abode, and described it, generally,-Cheltenham only, as it appeared in the register of voters. The revising barrister thought the description sufficient; and,-the party being unable to prove the qualification,-his name was expunged. If the court shall be of opinion that the decision was wrong, the name is to be restored, as well as the names of sixty persons whose names were expunged under similar circumstances, and whose appeals are consolidated with the principal case. Cockburn, for the appellant. The notice of objection must, according to the 6 & 7...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
The Wilderness Society (Tasmania) Inc v Minister for the Environment
...10 to minimise point-impacts. Lease and Licence conditions including: 12.4, A2.2(d,l,k,l,m), A2.4(a), A2.5(d), A3.8d(i), A3.8e(l,ii), B1.2(c), B1.2(f), C2.2, C4(A, Bii, Bvii, Bviii, Bix, 8) 12.4: Compliance with management objectives. The Operator must not do anything that is inconsistent w......
-
Ex parte William Hopton Wyld John Hopton Wyld, a Bankrupt
...to prove his claim against the estate without further difficulty. A number of authorities (to which might be added Lee, v. Sangster (2 C. B. 1) were cited, to shew that the want of the leave of the Court would not invalidate the award, although it might subject the assignees to penal liabil......
-
R (Salmon) v Feltham Magistrates Court and anor
...as to whether the first and second floor property was at the relevant time a property in multiple occupation within the meaning of paragraph 2C(b)(1) of the Council Tax (Liability for Owners) Regulations 1992. The second is, irrespective of whether it was or whether it was not, whether that......
-
Need-To-Know Divorce Tax Law for Legal Assistance Officers
...(CCH) 369 (1992). 328. Id. at 370. 329. Id. 330. Id. at 373. 331. Id. at 373 (citing Clapham v. Comm'r, 63 T.C. 505 (1975), acq., 1979-2 C.B.1). 332. 123 F.3d 190 (4th Cir. 1997) (reversing T.C. Memo 333. 70 T.C.M. (CCH) 163, 165 (1995). 334. Id. 335. Id. at 165-166. 336. Id. at 166 337. Id......
-
International Asset Protection Trusts (IAPTs)
...back into the gross estate of the settlor for federal estate tax purposes. [ Estate of Jalkut v. C.I.R. , 96 T.C. 675 (1991), acq., 1991-2 C.B.1.] §5:371 On the Death of a Beneficiary Assets of the IAPT are not normally included in the estate of a non-settlor beneficiary until distribution ......
-
The limited liability company: a catalyst exposing the corporate integration question.
...Estate of Marcello v. Commissioner, 36 T.C.M. (CCH) 1408 (1977); American Lithofold Corp. v. Commissioner, 55 T.C. 904 (1971), acq., 1971-2 C.B.1; Miles Prod. Co. v. Commissioner, 28 T.CM. (CCH) 1387 (1969); Mulder Bros. v. Commissioner, 26 T.C.M. (CCH) 217 (1967); Glasgow Village Dev. Corp......
-
§8.2 Lifetime Gifting Strategies
...474. Subsequently, the same result was reached in Estate of Cristofani v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. 74 (1991), acq. 1992-1 C.B. 1, acq. 1996-2 C.B.1. The IRS acquiesced in Cristofani but continues to maintain that a beneficiary must have actual notice of the withdrawal Although it may not be ne......
-
26 C.F.R. § 1.367(b)-7 Carryover of Earnings and Profits and Foreign Income Taxes In Certain Foreign-To-Foreign Nonrecognition Transactions
...(1974-2 C.B. 209) (see also §601.601(d)(2) of this chapter); Champion Int'l Corp. v. Commissioner , 81 T.C. 424 (1983), acq. in result, 1987-2 C.B. 1; Rev. Rul. 87-72 (1987-2 C.B. 170) (see also §601.601(d)(2) of chapter). As a result, no amount in excess of the aggregate positive amount of......
-
Law 21-212, B 759 – "Bicycle Awareness Motor Vehicle License Plate Amendment Act of 2016"
...as set forth in section 2b(b)(1). "(G) Any person ordering bicycle awareness identification tags shall pay the fees as set forth in section 2c(b)(1).". (2) Subsection (d) is amended as (A) Paragraph (2) is amended by striking the phrase "; and" and inserting a semicolon in its place. (B) Pa......