Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] UKSC 31 |
| Year | 2020 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
69 cases
-
Svante Kumlin v Camilla Jonsson
...from recovering losses occasioned by losses suffered by the company: Prudential Assurance v Newman (No 2) [1982] Ch 204; Marex Financial Ltd v Sevilleja [2021] AC 39. 182 They point to the First Claimant's evidence in his first witness statement at [45(4)] where he asserts that the Second C......
-
Tianrui (International) Holding Company Ltd v China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd
...judgment of Harman LJ in Bamford v Bamford [1970] Ch 212 and the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Marex Financial Ltd v Sevilleja [2020] UKSC 31; [2021] AC 39. The Court of Appeal rejected that argument, holding that the shareholder's loss was separate and distinct from any loss suffe......
-
Nectrus Ltd v UCP Plc
...consider whether permission to appeal on Ground 2 should still be granted in the light of the judgments of the Supreme Court in Sevilleja v Marex [2020] UKSC 31. I consider that permission to appeal on Ground 2 should now be refused. Reasons 1. In view of the limitation placed by the majori......
-
[1] Nissan Motor Company, Ltd [2] Nissan Middle East Fze v [1] Carlos Ghosn [2] Carole Nahas Ghosn [3] Beauty Yachts Pty Ltd
...but they have failed to plead to C1's alleged loss in the context of this alternative breach of duty claim under BVI law. 4 See Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31, esp. [108] to 5 [1949] 2 All E.R. 573 at 575, per Slade J 6 “ The secret commissions of which the Claimants curre......
Get Started for Free
8 firm's commentaries
-
Does The Rule Against Reflective Loss Apply To Former Shareholders? A Review Of Nectrus Ltd v UCP PLC
...CPR Part 52.30. The case considers both: (i) whether the rule against reflective loss, as considered by the USKC in Marex v Sevilleja [2020] UKSC 31 applies to former shareholders as well as to shareholders; and (ii) the 'exceptional' jurisdiction under CPR Part This Application arose in a ......
-
Court Of Appeal Confirms Reflective Loss Rule Will Bar Claims Of Former Shareholders Of A Dissolved Company Because The Principle Must Be Determined At Time Of Alleged Loss
...& Ors v Automobile Association Developments Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 1943. As a reminder, the Supreme Court in Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31 confirmed that the reflective loss principle is a bright line legal rule, which prevents only shareholders from bringing a claim based on ......
-
Reflective Loss And Strike Out / Summary Judgment: Burnford & Ors v Automobile Association Developments Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 1943
...through the key cases concerning reflective loss, the leading case being the Supreme Court decision in Marex Financial Ltd v Sevilleja [2020] UKSC 31, [2021] AC 39. Lord Justice Newey summarised the following points arising out of the leading The reflective loss principle applies where a sh......
-
Upon Further Reflection: Privy Council Judgment Further Clarifies Scope Of The Reflective Loss Rule
...Court's recent majority judgment in Marex Financial Ltd v Sevilleja (All Party Parliamentary Group on Fair Business Banking intervening) [2020] UKSC 31 as a starting point. It restated the law in Marex that the reflective loss rule is a rule of substantive company law, not a principle for t......
Get Started for Free
6 books & journal articles
-
Adieu to Attribution
...case’ that a company’s creditor may sue thecompany’s sole controller for dissipating the company’s assets) (armed on a dierent point[2020] UKSC 31; [2021] AC 39).102 See Goddard, n 85 above,17.103 See ibid, 12-13.104 The liquidator argued the sale was fraudulent because he wanted the comp......
-
Securities and Financial Services Regulation
...personal claims for reflective loss strengthens the asset partitioning effect of the company: see Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31 which majority position was adopted in Miao Weiguo v Tendcare Medical Group Holdings Pte Ltd [2021] SGCA 116. 50 Hans Tjio, “Restructuring the Bus......
-
Case Note
...3 at [151]. 49 [2021] UKSC 3 at [147]. 50 Lungowe v Vedanta Resources plc [2019] UKSC 20 at [53]. 51 In Marex Financial Ltd v Sevilleja [2020] UKSC 31, the minority judges advocated the abolition of the no-reflective loss rule. See also Miao Weiguo v Tendcare Medical Group Holdings Pte Ltd ......
-
Armstead v Royal Sun Alliance Insurance Company Ltd: The Interface between The Winkfield and Conarken
...r ights. See Clerk & Lindsell on Torts (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 23rd ed,2022) 16-64 and 30-41. See also Sevilleja vMarex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31;[2021] AC 39 per LordReed at [7];thus O’Sullivan ibid can be seen as an unexceptional example of a case ‘in which twodierent persons, such ......
Get Started for Free