Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2020] UKSC 31
Year2020
CourtSupreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
46 cases
  • Svante Kumlin v Camilla Jonsson
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 11 Mayo 2022
    ...losses occasioned by losses suffered by the company: Prudential Assurance v Newman (No 2) [1982] Ch 204; Marex Financial Ltd v Sevilleja [2021] AC 39. 182 They point to the First Claimant's evidence in his first witness statement at [45(4)] where he asserts that the Second Claimant's damag......
  • Nectrus Ltd v UCP Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 Enero 2021
    ...whether permission to appeal on Ground 2 should still be granted in the light of the judgments of the Supreme Court in Sevilleja v Marex [2020] UKSC 31. I consider that permission to appeal on Ground 2 should now be refused. Reasons 1. In view of the limitation placed by the majority of the......
  • Nissan Motor Company, Ltd v Carlos Ghosn
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 16 Mayo 2022
    ...but they have failed to plead to C1's alleged loss in the context of this alternative breach of duty claim under BVI law. 4 See Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31, esp. [108] to 5 [1949] 2 All E.R. 573 at 575, per Slade J 6 “ The secret commissions of which the Claimants curre......
  • [1] Nissan Motor Company, Ltd [2] Nissan Middle East Fze v [1] Carlos Ghosn [2] Carole Nahas Ghosn [3] Beauty Yachts Pty Ltd
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 16 Mayo 2022
    ...but they have failed to plead to C1's alleged loss in the context of this alternative breach of duty claim under BVI law. 4 See Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31, esp. [108] to 5 [1949] 2 All E.R. 573 at 575, per Slade J 6 “ The secret commissions of which the Claimants curre......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 firm's commentaries
3 books & journal articles
  • Securities and Financial Services Regulation
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2021, December 2021
    • 1 Diciembre 2021
    ...personal claims for reflective loss strengthens the asset partitioning effect of the company: see Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31 which majority position was adopted in Miao Weiguo v Tendcare Medical Group Holdings Pte Ltd [2021] SGCA 116. 50 Hans Tjio, “Restructuring the Bus......
  • Case Note
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2022, March 2022
    • 1 Marzo 2022
    ...3 at [151]. 49 [2021] UKSC 3 at [147]. 50 Lungowe v Vedanta Resources plc [2019] UKSC 20 at [53]. 51 In Marex Financial Ltd v Sevilleja [2020] UKSC 31, the minority judges advocated the abolition of the no-reflective loss rule. See also Miao Weiguo v Tendcare Medical Group Holdings Pte Ltd ......
  • Company Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2021, December 2021
    • 1 Diciembre 2021
    ...Automobile Pte Ltd [2021] SGHC 262 at [48]. 15 [2021] 4 SLR 1407. 16 [2020] 2 SLR 1190. 17 [2022] 1 SLR 884. 18 [2007] 2 SLR(R) 597. 19 [2021] AC 39. 20 (1843) 2 Hare 461. 21 See also Samantha S Tang & Alan K Koh, “Reflective Loss and Dishonest Assistance” [2022] LMCLQ 363. 22 Shanghai Ship......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT