Seyfang v G.D. Searle & Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1972
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Society of Lloyd's v Clementson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 Mayo 1996
    ...Shipping Co SA v DavisUNK [1979] 3 All ER 177. Lively Ltd v City of Munich (No. 1)UNK [1977] 1 Ll Rep 418. Seyfang v G D Searle & CoELR [1973] QB 148. Evidence — Expert witness — Subpoena — Lloyd's litigation — Underwriter failed to pay monies owing to syndicate — Debts paid by Lloyd's out ......
  • Cornec v Morrice and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 18 Septiembre 2012
    ...and the antipathy between Mr. Quinn and Mr. Garde, the Court considered the application to not be oppressive. Seyfang v GD Searle & Co [1973] QB 148 not applied. Thirdly, the Court would have to be satisfied that any privilege available to the witnesses would not be breached. In granting th......
  • Atlantica Holdings, Inc. v Sovereign Wealth Fund Samruk-Kazyna JSC
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 21 Febrero 2019
    ...This principle reflects judicial and international comity as well as the UK's international obligations under the Hague Convention: Seyfang v GD Searle & Co [1973] QB 148 at 151. In the often-quoted words of Lord Denning MR in Rio Tinto Zinc Corp v Westinghouse Electric Corp, supra, p560: ......
  • Re Norway's (State of) Application
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 Febrero 1986
    ...to letters rogatory so far as is proper and practicable and to the extent permissible under English law: see per Cooke J. in Seyfang v. GD Searle & Co. and Another (1973) 1 Q.B. 148 at 151: 'Judicial and international comity requires that any request of a foreign court for evidence to be ta......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • United Kingdom
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Obtaining Discovery Abroad. Third Edition
    • 8 Diciembre 2020
    .... See Rio Tinto Zinc Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp . [1978] AC 547 (HL) 560 (appeal taken from Eng.); Seyfang v. G.D. Searle & Co. [1973] QB 148 (EWHC) at 152 (Eng.); WHITE BOOK, supra note 3 , at n. 34.21.2. 11 . Evidence Act 1975 § 1(a). 12 . Id. § 1(b). 13 . Commerce & Indus. Co. o......
  • Australia
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Obtaining Discovery Abroad. Third Edition
    • 8 Diciembre 2020
    ...(NT) s 53; Evidence Act 1977 (Qld) s 37; Evidence Act 1958 (Vic) s 9N; Evidence Act 1906 (WA) s 117. 14 . Seyfang v G D Searle & Co. [1973] 1 QB 148, 151–2, [1973] 1 All ER 290; Rio Tinto Zinc Corp. v Westinghouse Elec. Corp. [1978] AC 547, 560, [1978]1 All ER 434; Re Attorney Gen.’s Applic......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT