SG v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (HB)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Neutral Citation | [2010] UKUT 243 (AAC) |
| Date | 2010 |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
VP CJSA 3172 2012
...“unreasonable” burden: see Brey at [73] and [74]. To the extent that my decision in SG v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (HB) [2010] UKUT 243 (AAC) suggests otherwise at [49], that part of that decision can no longer 88. I turn to the resources available to the claimant and in particu......
-
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v GS (PC)
...for CSIC. That concession was made by the Secretary of State, and accepted by me, in SG v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [2010] UKUT 243 (AAC). Accordingly, in the first instance it was necessary to establish whether this could be achieved via the The “competent state” issue 23. The ......
-
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions CPC 2676 2014
...that satisfies the requirement for CSIC. That concession was made by the Secretary of State, and accepted by me, in SG v Tameside MBC [2010] UKUT 243 (AAC). Accordingly, in the first instance it was necessary to establish whether this could be achieved via the EHIC. The “competent state” is......
-
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions CPC 3281 2014
...of the costs of any medical treatment the claimant might have required, the claimant had sufficient CSI: see SG v Tameside MBC (HB) [2010] UKUT 243 (AAC). Article 28a provided: “Where the pensioner entitled to a pension under the legislation of one Member State, or to pensions under the leg......