Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1951
Date1951
Year1951
CourtKing's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
47 cases
  • Jiang Haiying v Tan Lim Hui
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 19 Febrero 2009
    ...the promisor [the defendants]. 52 A case in which a collateral contract was successfully pleaded is Shanklin Pier Ld v Detel Products Ld [1951] 2 KB 854 (“Shanklin Pier”). In that case, the defendant paint manufacturers warranted to the plaintiffs, the owners of a pier, that the paint they ......
  • Foo Lian Sin and Another; Ng Chun Lin and Another
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 2000
  • Bandar Raya Developments Bhd v Ang Yoke Lian Construction Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Unspecified court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Andrews v Hopkinson
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ...the plaintiff. Solicitors: R. Stanley Pennington, Doncaster; J. W. Fenoughty, Dunn & Co., Rotherham. [Reported by G. M. SMAILES[1951] 2 All E.R. 471 (3) That as to damages for breach of the warranty the plaintiff was entitled not only to the difference in value of the car as warranted a......
  • Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
  • Contract formation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 Abril 2020
    ...paragraph 26.38f. 452 Although consideration may be found in other conduct of the parties: see Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products Ltd [1951] 2 KB 854 at 856, per McNair J. See also Hoyt’s Pty Ltd v Spencer (1919) 27 CLR 133; George Fischer Holdings Ltd v Multi Design Consultants Ltd (1998) ......
  • Security for performance
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume II - Third Edition
    • 13 Abril 2020
    ...Ltd v Canadian Paciic Railway Co [1982] 1 SCR 958 (noted by Slattery [1984] ICLR 279). 565 Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products Ltd [1951] 2 KB 854; Greater London Council v Ryarsh Brick Co Ltd (1985) 4 Con LR 85 at 89, per Judge Newey QC; Anti-Corrosion Pte Ltd v Berger Paints Singapore Pte ......
  • Consideration and Form
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Enforceability
    • 4 Agosto 2020
    ...are binding might hold that sending the information constitutes the requisite “peppercorn.” 102 99 Shanklin Pier v Detel Products , [1951] 2 KB 854; Murray v Sperry Rand Corp (1979), 23 OR (2d) 456 (HCJ). See generally SM Waddams, Products Liability , 4th ed (Toronto: Carswell, 2002) at 147......
  • Privity of Contract
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Enforceability
    • 4 Agosto 2020
    ...Ch 83 (CA); and Fournier Van & Storage Ltd v Fournier , [1973] 3 OR 741 (HCJ). 56 [1933] AC 70 (PC) [ Vandepitte ]. 57 Ibid at 80. 58 [1951] 2 KB 854. See also Wells (Merstham) Ltd v Buckland Sand and Silica Ltd , [1965] 2 QB 170; and Murray v Sperry Rand Corp (1979), 23 OR (2d) 456 (HCJ). ......
  • Get Started for Free