Sharp v Wakefield

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1891
Year1891
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
32 cases
  • Moses Bhagwan v Bernel G Chester Detective Inspector of Police
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
  • Tokio Marine & Nichido Insurance Company v Security National Insurance Company, 2020 ABCA 402
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 16 November 2020
    ...– unless the context indicates that they bear a technical sense”). [50] Alexis v. Alberta, 2020 ABCA 188 ¶ 47. See Sharpe v. Wakefield, 22 Q.B.D. 239, 242 (C.A. 1888) per Lord Esher, M.R. (“the words of a statute must be construed as they would have been the day after the statute was passed......
  • R. v. Perka, Nelson, Hines and Johnson, (1984) 55 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 1 February 1984
    ...[1971] Ch. 734, refd to. [para. 31]. D.P.P. (Northern Ireland) v. Lynch, [1975] A.C. 653, refd to. [para. 53]. Sharoe v. Wakefield (1888), 22 Q.B.D. 239, refd to. [para. Gambart v. Ball (1863), 32 L.J.C.P. 166, refd to. [para. 79]. Edwards v. A.G. Canada, [1930] A.C. 124, refd to. [para. 79......
  • R. v. D.L.W., 2015 BCCA 169
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 3 March 2015
    ...law. "The words of a statute must be construed as they would have been the day after the statute was passed ..." Sharpe v. Wakefleld (1888), 22 Q.B.D. 239, at p. 242 (per Lord Esher, M.R.). See also Driedger, Construction of Statutes (2nd ed. 1983) at p. 163: "Since a statute must be consid......
  • Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
  • Cases referred to in 1983
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1983 Preliminary Sections
    • 22 November 2022
    ...of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1980) 5 S.C. 112 at 163-164 228 Sey v. The King (1950) 13 W.A.C.A. 128. 70 Sharpe v. Wakefield (1888) 22 Q.B.D. 239 at 241- 2. 228 Shell B.P. etc. v. Jammal Engineering Nigeria Limited (1974) 1 All N.L.R. 542. 229 Shell B.P. Limited v. Abedi & ors (1974) ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Sovereignty, Restraint, & Guidance. Canadian Criminal Law in the 21st Century
    • 25 June 2019
    ...Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), 2002 SCC 68 .........................52, 63, 64, 378 Sharpe v Wakefield (1888), 22 QBD 239 (CA) ...............................................................100–1 Slaight Communications Inc v Davidson, [1989] 1 SCR 1038 .................................
  • Original Meaning
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Statutory Interpretation. Third Edition Establishing First Impression Meaning
    • 23 June 2016
    ...law. “The words of a statute must be construed as they would have been the day after the statute was passed . . .” Sharpe v. Wakefield (1888) 22 Q.B.D. 239 at p. 242 ( per Lord Esher, M.R.). See also Driedger, Construction of Statutes (2nd ed. 1983) at p. 163: “Since a statute must be consi......
  • Table of Cases
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 11 Preliminary sections
    • 3 July 2016
    ...Akinola (1993) 5 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 294) 434...................................................……………391 Sharp v. Wakefield (1891) A.C. 173; (1888) 22 Q.B.D. 239; 58 L.J.M.C. 57; 60 L.T. 130…..196, 237 Sharples v. Barton (1951) 13 W.A.C.A. 198………………......................................................
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT