Shayler v Woolf

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1946
Year1946
Date1946
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • West Tankers Inc. v Ras Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta Spa and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 21 March 2005
    ...assigned right with both the benefit and the burden of the arbitration clause. ( Aspel v. Seymour, [1929] W.N. 152; Shayler v. Woolf, [1946] 1 Ch. 320 not following the dicta in Cottage Club Estates v. Woodside Estates Co. Ltd., [1928] 2 K.B. 463.) In The Padre Island (No. 1), [1984] 2 L......
  • Through Transport Mutual Insurance Association (Eurasia) Ltd v New India Assurance Company Ltd [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 21 March 2005
    ...the assigned right with both the benefit and the burden of the arbitration clause. ( Aspel v Seymour [1929] WN 152; Shayler v Woolf [1946] 1 Ch 320 not following the dicta in Cottage Club Estates v Woodside Estates [1928] 2 KB 463) In the Padre Island (No 1) [1984] 2 Lloyds 408, Leggatt J......
  • Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi as v OOO Insurance Company Chubb
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 2020
  • Baytur SA v Finagro Holdings SA
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 June 1991
    ...sale, including the arbitration clause, could be and was validly assigned to the defendants on 15th December 1986: see Shayler v. Woolf [1946] Ch. 320, and The Jordan Nicolov [1990] 2 L.L.R. 11. 6 (2) The defendants thereupon became equitable assignees of the benefit of the buyers' claim ag......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • AN ASSIGNEE'S OBLIGATION TO ARBITRATE AND THE PRINCIPLE OF CONDITIONAL BENEFIT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...23, 2004 Rev Ed. 17Cassa di Risparmio di Parma e Piacenze SpA v Rals International Pte Ltd[2015] 1 SLR 79 at [204]. 18 Shayler v Woolf [1946] Ch 320 at 322–323; [1946] 2 All ER 54 at 58–59, effectively reversing the prior decision of Cottage Club Estates Ltd v Woodside Estates Company (Amer......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT