Shedden v Patrick and Attorney General

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1865
Year1865
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Corbett v Corbett
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 4 May 1953
    ...assuming also that the evidence so given was believed. It is not in doubt that in general the rule of this Court laid down long ago in Shedden v. Patrick and since followed in many cases is briefly this, that it being in the public interest that there should be an end of litigation, fresh e......
  • Eleftheria Niki Compania Naviera S.A. v Eastern Mediterranean Marine Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • Invalid date
  • Automatic Woodturning Company Ltd v Stringer
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 December 1956
    ...for leave to call fresh evidence (which there was not) it could only have been refused unless the practice consistently followed since Shedden v. Patrick L.R. 1 H.L. (Sc.) 470 was disregarded. Yet, so far as I can follow the reasoning of the Court, it was in order that the issue might be re......
  • Darrion Brown v Attorney General of Jamaica and Others
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 2 July 2013
    ...out a few where that statement had been made over 100 years ago. He stated at page 474 of the judgment: ‘Thus in Shedden v Patrick (1869) L.R. 1 Sc. & Div 470 at 545, Lord Chelmsford said: “It is an invariable rule in all the Courts, and one founded upon the clearest principles of reason an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT