Sheffield Corporation v Barclay
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Year | 1905 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 1905 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
50 cases
-
Lee Kuan Yew v Devan Nair (Straits Times Press (1975) Ltd and Another, Third Parties)
... ... 22 May 1988 which were broadcast and published on the radio by the British Broadcasting Corporation. The words complained of were: ... He [meaning Mr Francis Seow] did not do anything which ... for the act to be done: Dugdale & Ors v Lovering 8 and Lord Mayor & c of Sheffield v Barclay & Ors .9 In Dugdale v Lovering 8 the plaintiffs were in possession of certain ... ...
-
Triad Shipping Company v Stellar Chartering & Brokerage Inc. (Island Archon)
...charterparty contract; and second by the legal principle underlying the lawful request cases such as Sheffield Corporation v BarclayELR ((1905) AC 392): in other words, an implication of law. In his Lordship's judgment, therefore, the award and the judgment in the present case in favour of ......
-
Middle Temple v Lloyds Bank Plc [QBD (Comm)]
...[1914] 3 KB 356. Phillips v EyreELR (1870) LR 6 QB 1. Redmond v Allied Irish Banks plc [1987] 2 FTLR 264. Sheffield Corp v BarclayELR [1905] AC 392. Underwood (A L) Ltd v Bank of Liverpool and MartinsELR [1924] 1 KB 775. Yeung Kai Yung (Stanley) v Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking CorpELR [1981]......
- The Crown v Henrickson & Knutson
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
The site
...Civ 33. 230 Clearlite Holdings Ltd v Auckland City Corporation [1976] 2 NZLr 729 at 744, per Mahon J. 231 Sheield Corporation v Barclay [1905] aC 392 at 397, per the Earl of halsbury LC; R v Hendrickson (1911) 13 CLr 473. 232 Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] aC 655 at 692–693, per Lord Gof;......
-
Security for performance
...be entitled to an indemnity for any liability it has to a person who was afected by the tortious conduct: Sheield Corporation v Barclay [1905] aC 392 at 397, per the Earl of halsbury LC; R v Hendrickson (1911) 13 CLr 473. however, aside from such indemnities, the law will be slow to imply a......