Sheppards and Company v Wilkinson and Jarvis
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1889 |
| Year | 1889 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
71 cases
- ARP Aroonasalam Chitty; VVR Somasundaram Chitty
-
Cheng Poh Building Construction Pte Ltd v First City Builders Pte Ltd
...be entered in respect of the claims, it should be stayed pending trial of the counterclaims: see Sheppards & Co v Wilkinson & Jarvis (1889) 6 TLR 13. But where a counterclaim does not arise from the same transaction, or is not connected therewith, different rules apply: e.g., Anglian Buildi......
- Bench Win Sdn Bhd v EON Bank Berhad
-
PH Grace Pte Ltd and Others v American Express International Banking Corp
...should be granted until the counterclaim has been tried and decided upon. In support he relied on Sheppards & Co v Wilkinson & Jarvis (1889) 6 TLR 13. There the plaintiffs claimed for a sum of £7,500 advanced to the defendants. The latter alleged that certain agreements had been entered in......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
THE COURT‘S RESPONSE TO COUNTERCLAIMS IN PROCEEDINGS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
...the relevant passage in the Supreme Court Practice 1991 was based on the judgment of Lord Esher in Sheppards & Co v Wilkinson and Jarvis (1889) 6 TLR 13. 6 Supreme Court Practice 1991 (Sweet & Maxwell, 1990) at para 14/3-4/13. 7 Despite his Lordship‘s qualification that as the demarcation l......