Sheppards and Company v Wilkinson and Jarvis
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1889 |
| Year | 1889 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
72 cases
- ARP Aroonasalam Chitty; VVR Somasundaram Chitty
-
Cheng Poh Building Construction Pte Ltd v First City Builders Pte Ltd
...be entered in respect of the claims, it should be stayed pending trial of the counterclaims: see Sheppards & Co v Wilkinson & Jarvis (1889) 6 TLR 13. But where a counterclaim does not arise from the same transaction, or is not connected therewith, different rules apply: e.g., Anglian Buildi......
- Bench Win Sdn Bhd v EON Bank Berhad
-
PH Grace Pte Ltd and Others v American Express International Banking Corporation
...should be granted until the counterclaim has been tried and decided upon. In support he relied on Sheppards & Co v Wilkinson & Jarvis (1889) 6 TLR 13. There the plaintiffs claimed for a sum of £7,500 advanced to the defendants. The latter alleged that certain agreements had been entered in......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
THE COURT‘S RESPONSE TO COUNTERCLAIMS IN PROCEEDINGS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
...the relevant passage in the Supreme Court Practice 1991 was based on the judgment of Lord Esher in Sheppards & Co v Wilkinson and Jarvis (1889) 6 TLR 13. 6 Supreme Court Practice 1991 (Sweet & Maxwell, 1990) at para 14/3-4/13. 7 Despite his Lordship‘s qualification that as the demarcation l......