Shetland Sea Farms Ltd v Assuranceforeningen Skuld
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Year | 2004 |
| Date | 2004 |
| Court | Court of Session (Outer House) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Barrie Tonner And Another V. Reiach And Hall
...is a residual power of the Court to which it can resort in an appropriate case. In Shetland Sea Farms Ltd. v Assuranceforeningen Skuld 2004 SLT 30 Lord Gill under reference to the same article said that the Court of Session had an inherent power to dismiss a claim where the party pursuing i......
-
Petition Of A V. The Secretary Of State For The Home Department
...of the trial; for example, by the lodging of forged documents in support of a claim (Shetland Sea Farms Ltd v Assuranceforeningen Skuld 2004 SLT 30, at paras [144]-[146]); or by inordinate delay in the prosecution of an action (Hepburn v Royal Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust 2010 SLT 1071). In......
-
D.c. For Judicial Review Of A Decision To Return Him To Hospital Dated On Or About 8 December 2009 By Dr Ian Mitchell Nd A Decision Of The Mental Heal
...justified by extreme situations of a sort from which the present case is far removed [Shetland Sea Farms Ltd v Assuranceforeningen Skuld 2004 SLT 30 at 31I]. The situation where the RMO makes a repeat application for variation of a CTO to a community-based order cannot be characterised as a......
-
Helen Lennox Against Iceland Foods Ltd
...concept, see Macphail Sheriff Court Practice 4th Edition at para 2.23. [12] In Shetland Sea Farms Ltd v Assuranceforeningen Skuld 2004 SLT 30 at para 144, Lord Gill said: “There are many diverse ways in which a litigant can abuse the process of the court; for example, by pursuing a claim or......
Request a trial to view additional results