Shindler v Northern Raincoat Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1960
Date1960
CourtAssizes
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • Meridian Communications Ltd v Eircell Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 5 April 2001
    ...closing down its business. In Southern Foundries-v-Shirlaw 1940 2 All E. R. 445 and in Schindler-v-Northern Raincoat Company Limited 1960 2 All E. R. 239 it was held that a managing director could not be removed by the company in pursuance of the provisions of its articles when he had a ser......
  • 1) Berkeley Community Villages Ltd 2) Berkeley Group Plc v 1) Fred Daniel Pullen 2) Kathleen Marguerite Pullen 3) Alan John Pullen
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 7 June 2007
    ...Limited v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701, Lord Porter described it as a “well known principle”, and in Schindler v Northern Raincoat Co Limited [1960] 1 WLR 1038, Diplock J described it as “that respectable principle”. However, the limits of the implied term must be recognised. First, the implied ......
  • CF Partners (UK) LLP v Barclays Bank Plc and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 24 September 2014
    ...Though of antiquity, the formulation remains live; but it of course must yield to particular contexts and circumstances (see Schindler v Northern Raincoat Co Ltd [1960] 1 WLR 1038). I do not consider that in the present context and circumstances it has any application: the statement in the ......
  • Reid v Marshall et Al
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 13 May 2010
    ...v. Foster[1916] 1 Ch. 532; 44.4) Folami v. Nigerline (U.K.) Ltd.[1978] 1 I.C.R. 277; 44.5) Shindler v. Northern Raincoat Co. Ltd.[1960] 1 W.L.R. 1038 44.6) Newtherapeuties Ltd. v. Katz & or [1991] All E.R. 151 45 ) In the case of Foster v. Foster, however, it was made clear that this was a ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • CONTRACT DAMAGES AND THE PROMISEE'S ROLE IN ITS OWN LOSS.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 2, April 2019
    • 1 January 2019
    ...J) ('Esplin'). (148) Tredegar Iron & Coal Co Ltd v Hawthorn Bros & Co (1902) 18 TLR 716; Shindler v Northern Raincoat Co Ltd [1960] 1 WLR 1038, 1048 (Diplock J). Cf the position in the United States, where an anticipatory repudiation itself permits a claim for damages, subject to mi......
  • Plastic surgery - wrongful dismissal in Barbados after grosvenor v. The advocate Co. Ltd.
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 5-1, June 1995
    • 1 June 1995
    ...of the negative implied obligation. In his view, this was, unlike Read v. Astoria Garages (Streatham) Ltd., 38 a case "where an 35 [1960] 2 All E.R. 239. 36 Ibid .,244H-I . 37 [1940] 2 All E.R. 445. 38 [1952] 1 All E.R. 922. agreement has been entered into between the managing director and ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT