Shine v General Guarantee Corporation Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1988 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
- Hong Leong Bank Bhd v Chee Kok Weng; Next Car Sdn Bhd (Third Party)
-
Marion F. Lamarra V. Capital Bank Plc+shields Automotive Ltd Trading As Shields Land Rover
...problem had not been mentioned in the letter of 30 March 2001. Counsel also referred to Shine v General Guarantee Corporation Ltd [1988] 1 All E.R. 911, at page 915. If the first proposition relied upon was correct, it followed that the sheriff could be shown to have gone wrong. That was ev......
-
Louis-Fernand v Roserie Company Ltd
...that the vehicle was unfit for its purpose since it could not be driven. In Shine v. General Guarantee Corp (Reeds Motor Co. (a Firm) [1988] 1 All E.R. 911, it was held that a second hand vehicle was not fit for the purpose for which it was purchased when the plaintiff had thought that he ......
-
A.R.L. Lighting (Manitoba) Ltd. v. Dixon et al., [1998] B.C.T.C. Uned. F06
...has the opinion of this court to the same effect. [57] The plaintiff relies on the decision in Shine v. General Guaranty Corp. Ltd. [1988] 1 All E.R. 911 (Court of Appeal, Civil Division) where there was a finding that a car sold was not of merchantable quality and where the court commented......