Shona Wilson Stark, The Work of the British Law Commissions – Law Reform…Now?

Pages327-328
Date01 May 2018
Published date01 May 2018
DOI10.3366/elr.2018.0499
Author

“The Law Commission a talking shop which makes lawyers think they are effecting change when nothing changes (sic)”. So tweeted former minister Lord Adonis in October of last year, reflecting the views held by some in government – and indeed the general public – that the Law Commission and its Scottish counterpart, the Scottish Law Commission (“SLC”), are merely another quango producing very little in the way of real reform. Shona Wilson Stark's new text provides a strong riposte to this attitude and makes a robust (although not uncritical) defence of the law commissions and their work.

For a work on the mechanics of law reform, it is appropriate that the text in many ways mirrors the structure of a report by one of the commissions. We begin with a history of the formation of each commission and the relevant provisions of their founding legislation, the Law Commissions Act 1965 (“1965 Act”). Stark goes on to assess the manner in which the commissions operate within the confines of the legislation and theorises how it can best go about its stated objective “to take and keep under review all of the law”. Proposals are made as to how the work of the commissions can be improved and, as a commission report would, the book contains draft amendments to the 1965 Act to give effect to these recommendations.

The focus on the history of the commissions in the initial chapter is essential. As Stark puts it, “the longer you can look back, the further you can look forward”. Stark notes the impassioned pursuit of law reform by Lord Chancellor Gerald Gardiner, building on his work in Law Reform Now (G Gardiner & A Martin (eds), (1963)). Despite Gardiner's zeal, the passage of the 1965 Act was not straightforward and Stark highlights contemporary criticisms of ambiguity in the draft Bill. What is the scope of the commissions' activities? How is the commissions’ statutory duty to strive for “codification” to be carried out? How are the commissions’ recommendations to be timeously enacted into law and to what extent are the commissions to interact or cooperate in their work? These are questions which Stark argues were visible and noted from the formation of the commissions and have only become more pressing as the past fifty years have worn on.

The commissions' key duty in the 1965 Act – “to take and keep under review all of the law” – is staggeringly broad and Stark highlights the fact that the commissions require clear selection criteria to identify projects which are...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT