Short v Poole Corporation

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1926
Year1926
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
84 cases
  • Prescott v Birmingham Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 30 Noviembre 1954
    ...fashion that there was in truth no real exercise of it at all. By way of authority for this proposition Mr Rowe refers us to Short v. Poole Corporation, which is reported in 1926 1 Chancery Division at page 66, and Associated Provincial Picture Houses v. Wednesbury Corporation, reported in ......
  • City Council of George Town, Penang, The; Lai Cheng Lim
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 1960
  • Marks v Minister of Home Affairs
    • Bermuda
    • Court of Appeal (Bermuda)
    • Invalid date
  • R v Technical Director of Scientific Research Council et Al
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 9 Mayo 1984
    ...cite a great deal of authority on this point. The law is most fully explained in the judgment of Warmington L.J in Short v. Poole Corpn. [1926] Ch. 66 at pp. 90, 91.” 178 The occasion for those remarks was the termination by a regional hospital board of the employment of a consultant, whic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Termination of Appointments to Public Offices
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 24-1, March 1996
    • 1 Marzo 1996
    ...6QB682at715; 115ER257at270;HaymanvGovernorsofRugbySchool(1874) LR 18Eq 28at78and85perMallins VC;ShortvPooleCorporation[1926]Ch66 at90and91.RvOxfordCorporation(1696) 2Salk 428;191ER 372; RvIpswich(Bailiffs)(1706) 2LdRaym1233at1240; 92 ER 313at317-8;Hayman,vGovernorsofRugbySchool(1874) LR 18E......
  • The rule of law
    • Ireland
    • Irish Judicial Studies Journal No. 1-8, January 2008
    • 1 Enero 2008
    ...aimed at him. In much more recent times our law not _____________________________________________________ 27Short v. Poole Corporation [1926] Ch. 66, 91. Judicial Studies Institute Journal [2008: 1 130 only tolerated but imposed disabilities not rationally based on their religious beliefs o......
  • A wobbly balance? A comparison of proportionality testing in Canada, the United States, the European Union and the World Trade Organization.
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal No. 56, January 2007
    • 1 Enero 2007
    ...prescription of law was ultra vires for lack of jurisdiction. See Roncarelli v. Duplessis, [1959] S.C.R. 121; Short v. Poole Corporation, [1926] Ch. 66. (11) See Irwin Toy Ltd. v. Quebec, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 927 at para. 42 [Irwin We cannot ... exclude human activity from the scope of guarantee......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT