Silver (orse. Kraft) v Silver

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
Year1955
Date1955

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • HM Attorney General v Nasreen Akhter
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 February 2020
    ...of Hodson J. in Way v. Way [1950] P. 71, 79, approved by the Court of Appeal in Kenward v. Kenward [1961] P. 124, 133 and Silver v. Silver [1955] 2 All E.R. 614.” Lord Hailsham then went on to say, at p. 152E, that “in the light of the quotation from Lord Merrivale … it [could not] seriousl......
  • Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...E.R. 1123, C.A. Shedden v. Patrick (1869) L.R. 1 Sc. & Div. 470, H.L.(Sc.). Silver (orse. Kraft) v. Silver [1955] 1 W.L.R. 728; [1955] 2 All E.R. 614. Thoday v. Thoday [1964] P. 181; [1964] 2 W.L.R. 371; [1964] 1 All E.R. 341, Torok v. Torok [1973] 1 W.L.R. 1066; [1973] 3 All E.R. 101. ......
  • Vervaeke (formerly Messina) v Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 7 April 1982
    ...J. in Way v. Way [1950] P.71 at 79, approved by the Court of Appeal in Kenward v. Kenward [1961] P.124 at 133 and Silver v. Silver [1955] 2 All E.R. 614.'" 10There has been no serious dispute before your Lordships that the above statement is a correct statement of English law. Nor, in the ......
  • Puttick v Attorney General
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...C.A. Rex v. Lamb (1934) 24 Cr.App.R. 145, C.C.A. Rutter, In re [1907] 2 Ch. 592. Silver (orse. Kraft) v. Silver [1955] 1 W.L.R. 728; [1955] 2 All E.R. 614. Stephens v. Cuckfield Rural District Council [1960] 2 Q.B. 373; [1960] 3 W.L.R. 248; [1960] 2 All E.R. 716, Winans v. Attorney-General ......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...US v Rubenstein, 151 F 2d 915 at 918 (1945), Learned Hand J. See also Droit de la famille – 211784, 2021 QCCA 1389. Silver v Silver, [1955] 2 All ER 614; Iantsis (falsely called Papatheodorou) v Papatheodorou (1971), 3 RFL 158 (Ont CA), overruling Johnson (falsely called Smith) v Smith (196......
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 August 2020
    ...(1983), 34 RFL (2d) 249 at 253–54 (Man QB), Wilson J. US v Rubenstein, 151 F 2d 915 at 918 (1945), Learned Hand J. Silver v Silver, [1955] 2 All ER 614; Iantsis (falsely called Papatheodorou) v Papatheodorou (1971), 3 RFL 158 (Ont CA), overruling Johnson (falsely called Smith) v Smith (1968......
  • TRICKED INTO MARRIAGE.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 1, August 2018
    • 1 August 2018
    ...for immigration purposes based upon the parties' mental reservations: see, eg, H v H [1954] P 258, 264 (Karminski J); Silver v Silver [1955] 1 WLR 728. This is based upon an older principle that a person should not be able to assert his or her own mental reservation as a justification for n......
  • Prosecuting sham marriages under cayman's immigration law - the problems ahead
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 3-2, December 1993
    • 1 December 1993
    ...on the part of one or both of the parties to the marriage do not affect its validity". 9 [1979] 3 All E.R. 463. 10 Ibid., at 469. 11 [1955] 2 All E.R. 614. 12 Ibid ., at 615. As such he was not persuaded by the American authority of United States v. Rubinstein 13 in which it was stated: "If......