Simms v Simms ; A v A (A Child)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2002 |
| Neutral Citation | [2002] EWHC 2734 (Fam) |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
F v Secretary of State for Home Department and Another
...to the Secretary of State's decision. 38 Finally, Mr Wise sought to derive assistance from the President's observations in Simms v Simms, A v A (A Child) [2002] EWHC 2734 (Fam), [2003] Fam 83, at paras [70]-[71]. Whilst I entirely agree, if I may respectfully say so, with every word uttere......
-
CF v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another
...family life), Re[2002] EWHC 2278 (Fam), [2003] 1 FLR 292. Selmouni v France (2000) 7 BHRC 1, ECt HR. Simms v Simms; A v A (a child) [2002] EWHC 2734 (Fam), [2003] 1 FCR 361, [2003] Fam 83, [2003] 1 All ER 669, [2003] 2 WLR W and B (children) (careplan), Re, Re W (children) (care plan) [2001......
-
R (Burke) v General Medical Council
...with the kind of issues that arose for consideration in, for example, R v Cambridge Health Authority ex p B [1995] 1 WLR 898 and Simms v Simms, A v A (A Child) [2002] EWHC 2734 (Fam), [2003] Fam 83. 29 What this case is about is a form of treatment – ANH – which is relatively simple and ......
-
Claire F v (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department (2) Lia-Jade F (a minor by her litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
...of State's decision.38. Finally, Mr Wise sought to derive assistance from the President's observations in Simms v Simms, A v A (A Child)[2003] Fam 83, at paras [70]-[71]. Whilst I entirely agree, if I may respectfully say so, with every word uttered by the President, it does not seem to me ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
JUDGING BETWEEN CONFLICTING EXPERT EVIDENCE
...2 SLR 926 at [59]. 194 See Tracey Evans Chan, “Legal and Regulatory Responses to Innovative Treatment”(2013) 21(1) Medical L Rev 92. 195[2003] 2 WLR 1465; [2002] EWHC 2734. 196 See “Incompetent Patients, Experimental Treatment and the ‘Bolam Test’: JS v An NHS Trust; JA v An NHS Trust;”(200......
-
Case Comment: WHEN DEATH KNOCKS, WHO WILL ANSWER AND WHAT WILL THEY SAY?
...Re A (medical treatment: male sterilisation)[2000] 1 FCR 193 (taking into account emotional and other welfare concerns); Simms v Simms[2003] Fam 83 (“overall” best interests). 13 Supra n 1, at [10]. 14 Id at [11]. 15 Id at [8]. 16 Id at [3] and [9]. 17 Id at [3]. 18 Id, at [9]. 19 Id, at [1......
-
The Regulation of Xenotransplantation in the United Kingdom After UKXIRA: Legal and Ethical Issues
...op. cit., n. 32, at p. 3.60 Annas, op. cit., n. 38, at p. 126.61 McLean and Williamson, op. cit., n. 21, ch. 2.62 Simms v. Simms [2003] 1 All E.R. 669.ß2007 The Author. Journal Compilation ß2007 Cardiff University Law excellent illustration of the hazy lines between experimental treatment a......