Simpson v Tate

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date11 March 1925
Date11 March 1925
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • Ansell (Inspector of Taxes) v Brown
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 23 May 2001
    ...(1961) 40 TC 1 Fitzpatrick v IR Commrs (No. 2) TAXWLRTAX[1994] BTC 66; [1994] 1 WLR 306; (1994) 66 TC 407 Simpson (HMIT) v Tate ELRTAX[1925] 2 KB 214; (1925) 9 TC 314 Taylor v Provan (HMIT) ELRTAX[1975] AC 194; (1974) 49 TC 579 Income tax - Employment - Emoluments - Deduction - Expenses nec......
  • Fitzpatrick v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (No.2)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 17 February 1994
    ...Act of 1970 or its predecessors have been judicially considered in the past but not in relation to journalists. 18 In Simpson v. Tate [1925] 2 K.B. 214 a medical officer of health joined certain medical and scientific societies in order that by means of their meetings and published transact......
  • Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Hasil Dalam Negeri v Dr Arunjit Dutt
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1995
  • HM Revenue and Customs v Banerjee (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 July 2010
    ...decisions on each side of the border could not both be right. He referred ( 66 TC 407, at 521C) to the decision of Rowlatt J in Simpson v. Tate [1925] 2 KB 214, in which the judge had disallowed the claim by a medical officer of health to deduct the expenses of subscribing to professional s......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT