Sir Alexander Fraster's Case

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1728
Date01 January 1728
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

English Reports Citation: 90 E.R. 2

IN CHANCERY.

Sir Alexander Fraster's Case

5. sir alexander frasier's case in chancery. The King granted the custody, tuition, government, &c. of the body of an ideot, and the care, disposition, &c. of the profits of his lands to Sir Alexander Fraaier, his executors, administrators, or assigns, during the ideocy, &c. Q. If his executors or assigns shall have it? Argued, that if you consider the person 'tis grantable, be it prisoner in war, villain, &c. So likewise the estate, that here the King hath not a freehold, but only a chattel in the lands; and that the trust is coupled with an interest, which the King hath granted wholly out of him. His interest is during the ideocy, which he hath granted during the ideocy, that this case differs nothing from a wardship, which the King might grant over to another; and that shall be a chattel in him, and go to his executors : they say here is no skill required, but only to provide necessaries for the ideot and his family, and to repair his houses, &c. and that the better your ideot is- SKINNER, B. TERM. MICH. 33 CAR. 2. R. B. 3 provided for, the longer he will live; and so the well performing the duty is the interest of him who is to perform it. And Wallop said, that though by a grant of the care, &c. in general words, it should not go to assigns; yet when assigns are named it shall, and cited 11 E, 4, 1, and the case of Squib and Coming adjudged in the Exchequer for a teller's place there, pursuant to 11 E. 4. So here; Sollicitor Finch argued econtra, after taking the differences between ideot and lunaticks as to the property, he said as to the care and protection which the King had over them, they were alike; and said, that if the King granted a lunatick to one and his executors, no one would question but it determined with the death of the grantee; and he said in this case of an ideot, that the land should not go to executors, &c. and the custody be...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • James and Others, Assignees of Young, A Bankrupt, v Moriarty
    • Ireland
    • Queen's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 10 June 1874
    ...(2). The Chief Justice referred to Devon v .Watts (3). In a note to Graham v. Chapman it is said to have been decided earlier in Law v. Skinner (4), which is there asserted to have been decided in Easter Term, 15 Geo. 2. Now, when we examine the books we find Worseley v. Demattos (2) to hav......
  • The Rev. William Barnes, Clerk, Plaintiff; John Stuart, Leonard Severs, William Fall, and Catherine Robinson, Defendants
    • United Kingdom
    • Exchequer
    • 1 January 1834
    ...now under discussion passed sub silentio, and upon [137] prescriptive evidence the defendants were held to succeed. The case of Oxenden v. Skinner (4 Gwill. 1513 ; 3 E. & Y. 1384) is quite against the doctrine for which it was cited. There, a portion of the tithes, which had been severed fr......
  • Barry v Barry
    • Ireland
    • Queen's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 30 January 1891
    ...for judgment, and relied on the following cases :-Curtis v. Cottingwood (1); Rook-wood's Case (2) ; Dutton v. Poole (3); Braithwaite v. Skinner (4); Gregory v. Harman (5) ; Ewer v. Jones (6) ; Topham v. Moore-craft (7) ; Hart v. Minors (8) ; Williams v. Lee (9) ; Edgware (1) 1 Vent. 29. (2)......
  • Beggan v M'Donald
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 18 November 1878
    ...at p. 100, is wholly inÂÂconsistent with the dictum as to the forty years' user in Bright v. Walker (1). Wilson v. Stanley (3), Palk v. Skinner (4), show clearly that Bright v. Walker (1) is not an authority save so far as stated. Cur. adv. vult. BALL, C. :- The facts which raise the quest......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Appendix
    • European Union
    • Study to support the review of the list of restricted substances and to assess a new exemption request under RoHS 2 (Pack 15). Final report Exemption evaluation
    • 8 February 2021
    ...in which cement and cement-containing mixtures are handled solely by machines and in which there is no possibility of contact with the skin. 4. The standard adopted by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) for testing the water-soluble chromium (VI) content of cement and cement-c......
  • Massachusetts Genetic Bill of Rights: chipping away at genetic privacy.
    • United States
    • Suffolk University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 4, November 2012
    • 1 November 2012
    ...strands of hair every day. (2) Humans make one liter of saliva each day. (3) In a lifetime, the average human sheds about forty pounds of skin. (4) Hair, skin, and saliva are just a few ways in which individuals leave behind traces of their identity in the form of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA......
  • Mandating health insurance benefits for cancer.
    • United States
    • State Legislatures Vol. 36 No. 1, January 2010
    • 1 January 2010
    ...and bronchus 15% Prostate 25% WOMEN 713,220 All other sites 22% Pancreas 3% Ovary 3% Kidney and renal pelvis 3% Thyroid 4% Melanoma of the skin 4% Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma 4% Urine corpus 6% Colon and rectum 10% Lung and bronchus 14% Breast 27% Excludes basal and squamous cell skin cancers an......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT