Sir Edmund Bacon's Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 267
King's Bench Division
sir edmund bacon's case. Eu TEsohequer un quo warranto fuit sue p le Roy v* Sir Edmund Bacon pur le liberty de Bury, & il claim sack-sock, infangthest, & outfangthest, per prescription de le Abbot des Bury, & pleader les grants del E. 4. H. 8. & sur confessions del Attorneys Generals, adonque judgment fuit done pur luy. II plead ouster, que 3 Jac. le Roy recitant le quo warranto, et lea judgments, releases, & confirms touts errors, & misprisions, & grants, que il avera touts les liberties in cy ample manner, que ascuu ad devant luy. Le plea fuit large & tedious. Et Noy prist divers exceptions en le behalf del Roy; mes jeo ue oyer son argumet. Mes Hentlon argue pur Sir Edmund, & il respond al exceptions raise p Noy. Et premierement il dit, que ad estre object, que le prescription pur sack-sock, &c. est male; entant, que il ne express, & explain le sence, & meaning de eux issirit, que ue appiert, quel liberties il claim per ceux parols. Mes jeo conceive, que n'est necessary al expresser, & explainer le meaning des parols. Premierement, entant, que le sense de deux est conus bien al lawyers, & cy bien certain. Bracton 116. cap. 1. Fleta, lib. 19. cap. 47. 2 Rep. 310. 22 E. 3. Rot. 237. Et touts les presidents sont accordant; entant, que nulls presidents express le sence des parols. Et jeo voil allow deux diversities. Premierement, les parols del plea ne serra expound; mes si le Counsel de Roy voile demand le sence de eux, donque serra expound. Kell. 142. 145. Mes ove cest difference, lou le suit est a destroyer les liberties, donque le subject n'est compellable de expounder ceux parols sur demand. Mes si [46] les parols sont en grant, doriq^ sur demand sont estre expound. Kell. 139. Secoudement, le respons serra general en le plea quia le charge en le quo warranto eat general. Tertiament, Tstatute in 32 H. 8. revive les liberties queux fuer in abbots. Et ad estre object, (^ Tabbot ne poet prescribe esteant uu special person, & pur cest Sir Edmund quel elaim p luy ne poet prescribes Le opinion des Judges est, q^ un special person poet prescribes Kell. 143. 147. Et ad ee object, ^ les charters sont pleaded destre allow, & nemy prescription. Mes a c jeo die, que allowance en eire d'un charter, que port date hors memory, fait que le prescription serra allow auxi. 9 Rep. 29. 1 H. 4, 5. Le liver de 9. H. 7. 11. ad estre object. Mes jeo ay view le record, P. 9 H. 7. Rot. 40. Et...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
50 C.F.R. § 226.212 Critical Habitat For 15 Distinct Population Segments (Dpss) of Salmon and Steelhead (Oncorhynchus Spp.) In Washington, Oregon and Idaho
...the following subbasins: (1) Middle Columbia/Hood Subbasin 17070105- (i) East Fork Hood River Watershed 1707010506. Outlet(s) = Hood River (Lat 45.6050, Long upstream to endpoint(s) in: Dog River (45.4655, -121.5656); East Fork Hood River (45.4665, -121.5669); Pinnacle Creek (45.4595, -121.......