Sir George Trenchard v Peter Hoskins
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1657 |
| Date | 01 January 1657 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 124 E.R. 137
COMMON BANCK AND EXCHEQUER
sir george trenchard versus peter hoskins, intr' 19 Jac. Rot. 550. Sir George Trenchard fuit Plaintiff in Accon de Covenant versus Peter Hoskins, & le Accon fuit tiel; Fitzwilliams bargain & vend terre al Henry Hoskins, que devie seisie, & le terre descend al John Hoskins, & il & Peter Hoskins per Indenture infeoff Le Plaintiff. Et donque John & Peter Hoskias Covenant in Manner and Form following, que John Hoskins est seisie de bon perfect & indefeasible estate in Fee-simple in cest terre; & que il ou Peter Hoskins avoit bone & loyal Authority a vender ceo, & n'est ascun reversion ou remainder de cest terre in le Corone per ascun act fait per John Hoskins, ou Peter Hoakins ou ascun de eux: Le Plaintiff assign le breach, que John C. P. n.-5* 1S8 MICH. 3 CAR. IN COMMUNI BANCO LITTLETON, 63. Hoskins ne fnit seisie de bou estate in Feeaitnple, & que ils avoient polar &e. per aacun act fait per eux lour beira & Assigns, & le Plaintiffs demur. Henden pur le Plaintiff. Primerment, que eat bon breach aasign. Secundo, que le barre eat male. Le Question est aur lendenture on ceux parola al fine del Covenant (pur aacun act fait per eux ou chescun de eux) si refer al tout devant ou, al oest darreiu part lolement. Primo. Cbescun de ceux Covenants sont aeveral in le matter & manner. Primerment sont penned severalment. Car est primes general Covenant, que fuit seisie &c. (&) avoyant poiar &c. (&) que nul reversion, &c. Si avoit ee que ils Covenant que fuit seisie, & Covenant que avoit poiar, &c. & Covenant que nul reversion, &c, serrout several Covenants ans question. Et icy eat cy mult in effect, IS Eliz. Dyer 35. cite in 18 Rep. 65. b. Whistlers Case adjudge la, que le Advowson passe per: le darrein clause. Secondfn t. Le Indenture in le frame de ceo amount d'aver several Covenants. Car Intelligentia varborum fit ex Coherentia ver-[63]-borum. Et ex precedent! & consequent! optima fit interpretatio. Le Primer Covenant eat pur John Hoskina solemeut; la darrein pur John & Peter Hoskins; que monatre lea Covenanta dee aeveral. Tiercement. Lea deux primer Covenants sont in le affirmative, & le darrein in le negative; donque nest aacun case ou former Covenants aont in le affirmative, & darrein in le negative, que ceo serroit explanacon del former; & affirmative & negative aont several in lour natures a pleader; car affirmative Covenant plead generalment eat bon...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wilson v Weddell
...80 E.R. 97 IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH Wilson and Weddell wilson versus weddell. 1 Brownl. 143. Trespass. 1 Eo. Abr. 502. 2 Roll. 264. Co. Litt. 62. (a). Gro. Car. 283. Cm Jac. 403. 3 Lev. 385. 1 Vent. 361. 2 Wils. 14. 162. 1 Burr. 206. 1 Term Eep. 261. 2 Term Rep. 198. The plaintiff's gra......
-
The King against Dame Jane St. John Mildmay, Lady of the Manor of Marwell, in the Country of Southampton, and William Bray, Esquire, her Steward of the said Manor
...surrender is not tenant to every intent; he continues tenant merely for preservation of the tenancy, and not to cause escheat (c)2. In Co. Lit. 62 a., it is said, "By surrender out of court the copyhold estate passes to the lord under a secret condition that it be presented at the next cour......
-
James against Trollop
...well as to the party himself, for he may have tythes in kind, and by the same reason he may have a modus: he cited 3 Cro. 317. 1 Cro. 317. Litt. 62. The alledging it in this special manner is a good way of pleading: see Westm. 1, cap. 39. A writ of right was to be brought on a deed. If [441......
-
Frosel against Welsh
...to his heir, notwithstanding the lord has accepted rent from the eestuy que use. Ante, 100. 1 Roll. Ab. 502. 505. S. C. Godb. 268. Co. Lit. 62. S. C. Bridg. 49. Cro. Eliz. 349. Cro. Car. 283. 4 Co. 29. S. C. 3 Bulst. 216. 219. 237. 3 Lev. 238. 385. 1 Vent. 261. Ch. Cas. 171. 2 Sid. 61. Stil......
-
Ethnic Political Mobilization in a Mexican American Community an Exploratory Study of East Los Angeles 1965-1972
...one considers the distinctionsthat should be drawn between &dquo;assimilation&dquo; and &dquo;acculturation.&dquo; Gordon, Parenti,Gans, and Litt62 have all pointed out that the use of these two terms interchange-58 For a typology distinguishing between "Protestant Ethic" and non-Protestant......