Sir Gregory Fenner v Evesque de London Pasvill & Michelson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1657
Date01 January 1657
CourtCourt of Common Pleas

English Reports Citation: 124 E.R. 113

COMMON BANCK AND EXCHEQUER

Sir Gregory Fenner
and
Evesque de London Pasvill & Michelson

sir gregoey fenner versus evesque de london pasvill & michelson. Sir Gregory Fenner port Quare irapedit versus Eveaque de London, Paavill & Micpelaon Incumbent, al presenter al Esglise de Chelmsford ; & declare que Sir Thomas Mildraay fuit seisie d'un Mannor a quel le Advowson fuit appendant, & suffer recovery del Man nor al use de luy mesme pur vie, Remainder al son fits Thomas pur vie, ova multa Remainders ouster; Et le Esglise eeant voyd, il present Pasvill & devye. Son, fits Thomas fait Lease pur 60 ans al Plaintiff, & Leagliae voyd per resignacon de Pasyill, & isaint perteigne al Plaintiff a preaenter. Le Defendant Pasvill priat issue sur le Appendancy. Michelson le Incumbent pleade que fuit un corrupt agreement proyuadatn pecunias summa inter Sir Thomas Mildmay, & Sir Thomas Joslin & Paavill, que; Pasvill aerra present; & recite le Statute de 31 Eliz. cap. 6. per que est enact, que! le Esglise serra voyd absque hoc que Lesglise fuit voyd per resignacon, & le Plaintiff demurre, & monstre le cause, pur ceo que le plea est double, pur 3 reasons. Pritaerment, ou un Presentation est pleade, & le presentation est confease & avoyd in le barre, la ne; unque doet ea traverse de manner del avoydance; Car le presentation est le substance del declaration, & le resignation forsque conclusion & consequent sur ceo. Co. 2. Spencer & Kuightlies Case. Et pur le presentation est le substance. Appeirt 26 H. 8. 4. Fitzh. la ne admit un traverse del seisin in Fee, mes intimate que le presentation, est le principal, 13 H. 8. 15. 15. h. G. Quare impedit 77, le plaintiff, la iti Quare inpedit intitle luy al Manner, a que le Advowson fuit appendant, [15] le Defendant dit que apres il fuit seisie del Advowson, & present &c. Et ne traverse le Appeudancye, Car le presentciecm est le cheife. :Secundo, Le Preseutacon alleadge in le Count est avoyde per matter in ley, scil. per;act de Parliament en le barre, & in tiel case, il ne unque traveraer, 5 H. 7. 14. per Huasey, si home pleade in barre, & le Plaintiff replie matter in ley, il ne unque traverser le barre; per mesme reason, PI. Com. 232. b. :3. Le barre icy est plaine & absolute barre sans traverse, al touts purposes, & nul post monstre cause de ceat traverse ; & le Symonye est perfect barre : Et le diversitie, est, que in touts cases, ou le manner de avoydauce doet ee traverse, la ils doent...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Jeffreson, Executor of Jeffreson, against Morton, and Dawson, and Others, Tertenants of Yarway
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1845
    ...by descent, must take as heir to him who was last actually seised, therefore A. took the reversion wholly as heir to her father; and Co. Litt. 14, 15, and Kellow v. Rowden, Garth. 126, S. C. 1 Show. 244, were held to be good authorities in point. 2 Wils. 45, Jenkins v. Pritchard. Therefore,......
  • SEE CHOO PHAN vs SEE CHOO GIAP
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 30 June 2021
    ...For the Plaintiffs Messrs Junaida Afuan & Quek Advocates & Solicitors No. 12, First Floor Jalan Sayang 84000 Muar Johor. [Ref. No.: JAQ/M/LIT/14/2019/NR] 70 [JB-22NCVC-66-10/2019] June 30, 2021 For the Defendants Messrs C T Chew & Co. Advocates & Solicitors No. 43-G, Jalan Ong Kim Wee 75300......
  • Mortgage Corporation Ltd v Nationwide Credit Corporation Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 14 May 1993
    ...49 in respect of an equitable charge, the general rule as to the priority of equitable charges was qui prior est tempore potior est jure (Co Litt 14). There was no doubt that the main purpose of protecting an equitable charge by a notice under section 49 was to affect every subsequent purch......
  • Thomas Wimbish and Elizabeth his wife, plaintiffs, and Elizabeth Tailbois, Defendant
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1816
    ...238. Co. Litt. 22 a. (c) H. 14 H. 7. 18 b. per Wood. Bro. Parliament, 21. Moor, 508. post 59. 178. (d) Dyer, 10 h. 11 a. pi. 40. Co. Litt. 14 b. 1 Co. 121 b. 4 Co. 22 a. T. Eaym. 317. Ld! Eaym. 876. 1 Finch. 15. 2 Finch. 21. Bac. Read, on Statute of Uses. (e) M. 5 Ed. 4. 7 b. Fitz. Subpoena......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The information behaviours of disadvantaged and disengaged adolescents
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Documentation No. 72-3, May 2016
    • 9 May 2016
    ...and Attitudes Repor t. Available at: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-re search/other/research-publications/adults/adults-media-lit-14/ Ofcom (2014c) Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report. Available at: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/ media-lit......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT