Sir John Barnardiston v Lingood

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHigh Court of Chancery
Judgment Date09 February 1740
Date09 February 1740

English Reports Citation: 26 E.R. 484

HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY

Sir John Barnardiston
and
Lingood

See Benyon v. Cook, 1875, L. R. 10 Ch. 392 (n.).

lowther versus condon, June 6, 1741. This cause was brought on again by the defendant on a petition of re-hearing, when the Attorney General of counsel for him cited the following cases : Pawlet versus Pawlet, 2 Vent. 366, 367, on a settlement. Hall versus Terry (see my 1st vol. of Rep. 502), M. T. 1738, before Lord Hardwicke. Bradley versus Powell, before Lord Talbot, May 1736, on a settlement. Butler versus Duncomb, 2 Vern. 760. Brown versus Berkley, M. T. 1728. Duke of Chandos versus Talbot, 2 Will. 609. Prowess versus Abingdon, 1738 (see my 1st vol. of Rep. 482). The cases cited for the plaintiff were King versus Withers, Free, in Chan. 348; Eq. Ca. Abr. 112. Bruin versus Bruin, 2 Vern. 439. Pitfield's case, 2 Will. 513. Wilson versus Spencer, before Lord King, assisted by Sir Joseph Jekyll, 1732. Atkins 2 ATK. 131. LOWTHER V. CONDON 483 versus Hiccock, July 1737 (see my 1st vol. of Rep. 500). -Carter versus Bletsoe, 2 Vern. 616. . . The case of Bradley versus Powell (Ca. Temp. Talb. 193, S. C. In the case of Tunstall v. Bracken, Amb. 167; 1 Bro. Cha. Rep. 124, S. C.. Lord Hardwicke expresses his disapprobation of this case of Bradley v. Powell), being much relied upon by the defendant's counsel, was stated more fully, and is as follows : [131] John Powell tenant for life, remainder to Henry his eldest son in tail, by recovery, &c., settled the estate to the use of John the father for life, as to part, remainder to trustees for 200 years, upon trust to raise 1100 for Richard the second son,.to be paid him within six years after the death of John, or as soon after as the same...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Secured Property Loans Ltd v Floyd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 21 March 2011
    ...THE LAW OF TRUSTS IN IRELAND 4ED 2007 ALEC LOBB (GARAGES) LTD & ORS v TOTAL OIL GB LTD 1983 1 WLR 87 1983 1 AER 944 BARNARDISTON v LINGOOD 26 ER 484 1740 2 ATK 133 MONEY-LENDERS ACT 1900 S1 MONEY-LENDERS ACT 1900 S1(1) A DEBTOR, IN RE 1903 1 KB 705 EQUITY Unconscionable bargain Mortgage - I......
  • Sheffield v Lord Orrery and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 4 December 1745
    ...Caverley v. Dudley, post, 541. Floyer v. Sperard, Amb. 18. Searle v. Carpenter, Amb. 242. Gwynne v. Heaton, 1 Bro. Cha. Rep. 1Barnardiston v. Lingood, 2 Atk. 133. Stanhope v. Cope, 2 Atk. 231. Willis v. Jernegan, ibid. 251. Longuet v. Sea-wen, 1 Ves. 402. Caverley v. Dudley, post, 541. Floy......
  • Earl of Chesterfield and Others Executors of John Spencer v Sir Abraham Janssen
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 1 January 1750
    ...to tax the defendant 2 VES. SEN. 161, PRIEST V. PARROT1 Atk. 301, S. C.; Cowp. 770; Brown, 1; 2 Vern. 14, 27, 121; 1 Wms. 310; 3 Wms. 290 ; 2 Atk. 133.)-[Supplement, 297.] The state of the case upon the pleadings and proofs, as far as was material for the consideration of the court, was sho......
  • Boothby v Boothby
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 20 December 1849
    ...and Mr. Nalder, for the Appellants, contended that the contingency in question was one the value of which could be calculated; Barnardiston v. Lingaod (2 Atk. 133); Bowes v. Heaps (3 V. & B. 117); Daoies v. Cooper (5 Myl. & Cr. 270)} that the observations of Sir J. Leach in Baker v.......
  • Get Started for Free