Sir Simon Clark's Case

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1662
Date01 January 1662
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 244

King's Bench Division

Sir Simon Clark's Case

Plusieurs tres-bons CASES, come ils estoyent adjudgees es Trois Premiers Ans du Eaign du feu ROY CHARLES le PREMIER en la COURT de BANK le ROY, non encore Publiees per aucun Autre: Colligees per le feu scavant & tres-erudite Homme Monsieur JEAN LATCH du Middle-Temple, London, Esq. 1662. [1] sir simon clark's case, term. pasch^e, primo caroli primo, banco eegis. Sir Simon Clark port un action sur le case f S. pur disant de luy ceux parols, viz. Sir Simon Clark kept Faulkner the Jeauite in hia house a week together, knowing him to be a Jesuite, &c. Et verdict fuit pur le plaintiff, & 1001. dam done. Et Davenport Ser. mover en arrest del judgment. 1. Qua neat averr quand ceux parols fuere parle, car poyent estre parle devant le statute del 27 Eliz. cap. 2. ^ done punishment a luy q receave priests, & Jeauites, mes devant nul punishment fuit pur receivant, mea per cest atatute ceo est fait felony. [2] Nest averr q^ le Jesuit fuit nee diens ceo realm come le statute require. Crew Ser. al contra, & il monstre un expresse president Hill. 9 Jac. Rot. 10484. Splint, & Smith. Thou hast harboured a seminary priest, the other answered, It may be so, and I not know it: the other replyed, Thy father, thy mother, and thy self, didst harbour him, and did know him to be a priest. Et un action sur cest case fuit port sur ceux parols, & adjudge q^ git, pur reason del darrein parols, knowing him to be a priest, issint icy, knowing him to be a Jesuit. Et le record fuit lye, & rule monstre pur entring del avant dit judgment; sur view de quel president judgment fuit per totam Curiam, que action en cest case gist. Crew Chief Justice, dit 4j est un stronge presumption, q^ Faulkner le Jesuite in cest case fuit nee en Angliterre come le statute require, entant q^ le nosme Faulkner est un English nosme. Et per totam Curiam le primer exception fuit disallow, quia ne serra intend q^ les parols fuere parle cy longe temps passe. Jones, Jeo confesse, quand parols sont dubious ils serra pris in rnitiore sensu come si un dit, q^ I. S. hath the pox, aerrera intend le smal pox, & un action ne gist, mes in parols lou est un stronge presumption, q, le party intend un scandal la le action gist, & pur ceo fuit adjudge en ceat Court en un Sidnam's case, % un action git pur ceux parols, I. S. is layd of the pox, quod nota, isaint icy est un strong presumption...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Moise v Greater Germiston Transitional Local Council: Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development Intervening (Women's Legal Centre as Amicus Curiae)
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Limitation of Legal Proceedings (Provincial and Local Authorities) Act 94 of 1970, s 2(l)(a): seeJuta's Statutes of South Africa 2000vol lat 1-699. Adjudication in terms of s 172 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1 996 of an order made in the Witwatersrand Local......
  • Preston v Collett
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 12 January 1852
    ...(10 Adol. & Ell. 90); Goveft v. Richmond (7 Sim, 1); Mangles v. Dixon (1 Hall & Tw. 542 ; and 1 Mac. & G. 437); Roddy v. Williams (3 Jones & Lat. 1); and being bound by the conformation, Hobbs v. Norton (1 Vern. 136); Earl of Chesterfield v. Jangsen (1 Altt. 339). As to constructive notice ......
  • Crofts v Allman
    • Ireland
    • Rolls Court (Ireland)
    • 15 January 1849
    ...v. Lynch 2 Sch. & Lef. 1. Letexier v. Margravine of Anspack 15 Ves. 164. Beadles v. BurchENR 10 Sim. 338. Roddy v. WilliamsENR 3 Jo. & Lat. 1. Fenwick v. ReedENR 1 Mer. 114. Benson v. HadfieldENR 5 Beav. 554. Pearse v. HewittENR 7 Sim. 471. Mole v. SmithENR Jac. 490. Howe v. BestUNK 5 Mad. ......
  • Bronson et al. v. Hewitt et al., 2010 BCSC 169
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 8 February 2010
    ...trustee. Some older English authorities have held that absent an expressed disclaimer, acceptance is implied: Re Uniacke (1844), 1 J.O. & Lat 1; Re Needham (1844) 1 J.O. & Lat 34. In those cases, the court concluded that a long period of inaction raised the presumption that a truste......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
  • Using The Work Product Doctrine
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Guerrilla Discovery - 2014 Contents
    • 5 August 2014
    ...items prepared in the ordinary course of the attorney’s 4 business and those prepared in the ordinary course of the client’s business. The lat- 1 Dowden v. Superior Court, 86 Cal. Rptr.2d 180, 73 Cal.App.4th 126 (Cal. App. 1999), says it best by holding that the Work Product Doctrine limits......
  • Does Race Influence Police Disciplinary Processes?
    • United States
    • Sage Justice Research and Policy No. 3-1, June 2001
    • 1 June 2001
    ...(93.6%) Guilty43.2% White (38)50.0% Black (44) 2.3% Hisp/Lat (2) 4.5% Other (4)6 (6.4%) Not Guilty83.3% White (5) 0% Black (0)16.7% Hisp/Lat (1) 0% Other 108 • Justice Research and Policylowed subsequent to charging. Among those who had a hearing before the PBI,white officers were found gui......
  • Are We Closing the Gap? Reforms to Legal Capacity in Latin America in Light of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
    • United States
    • Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Vol. 56 No. 1, January 2023
    • 1 January 2023
    ...de discapacidad: andlisis de la ley 1996 de 2019 [Capacity in a Situation of Disability: Analysis of the Law 1996 from 2019], 4(1) REVISTA LAT1N0AMERICANA EN DISCAPACIDAD, SOCIEDED Y DERECHOS HUMANOS 60, 82 (351.) See Interview: CO-1, supra note 54; Julia Betancur. El cambio de paradigma de......
  • Climate Change: Canadian Legal and Policy Responses
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Environmental Law. Third Edition
    • 8 September 2009
    ...studies, including studies of the Canadian Arctic, the Prairies and the Great Lakes have pursued the inquiry in more detail. 6 The lat-1 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis — Summary for Policymakers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Pre......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 provisions
  • Moore Street Market and North Dublin City Improvement Act 1882
    • United Kingdom
    • UK Non-devolved
    • 1 January 1882
    ...the county of Dublin wherein burials may lega\ly take place. Extinguish- 43 . When and so soon as the Company hve acquired any of mark0/ ^ e laT1^s delineated on the deposited plans and described in the rights, &c. deposited book of rfrence ail franchises liberties and rights of market (if ......
  • 47 C.F.R. § 73.208 Reference Points and Distance Computations
    • United States
    • Code of Federal Regulations 2023 Edition Title 47. Telecommunication Chapter I. Federal Communications Commission Subchapter C. Broadcast Radio Services Part 73. Radio Broadcast Services Subpart B. Fm Broadcast Stations
    • 1 January 2023
    ...the results to degrees. (2) Calculate the middle latitude between the two reference points by averaging the two latitudes as follows: ML=(LAT1dd +LAT2dd (3) Calculate the number of kilometers per degree latitude difference for the middle latitude calculated in paragraph (c)(2) as follows: K......
  • 47 C.F.R. § 1.958 Distance Computation
    • United States
    • Code of Federal Regulations 2023 Edition Title 47. Telecommunication Chapter I. Federal Communications Commission Subchapter A. General Part 1. Practice and Procedure Subpart F. Wireless Radio Services Applications and Proceedings Application Requirements and Procedures
    • 1 January 2023
    ...= 111.41513 cos ML - 0.09455 cos 3ML + 0.00012 cos 5ML(e) Calculate the North-South distance in kilometers as follows:NS = KPDlat * (LAT1dd - LAT2dd)(f) Calculate the East-West distance in kilometers as follows:EW = KPDlon * (LON1dd - LON2dd)(g) Calculate the distance between the locations ......
  • 209.02.03 Ark. Code R. § 007 2002 Amendments to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (Nist) Handbooks 44, 130, 133 and the Annual Book of the American Society For Testing and Material (Astm) Standards
    • United States
    • Arkansas Administrative Code 2023 Edition Agency 209. Arkansas Agriculture Department Division 02. State Plant Board
    • 1 January 2023
    ...Elements (no metrological change) Remanufactured Device Remanufactured Element Still Traceable to NTEP CC Marking Required Weighing Activity LAt -1-W Disassembly of A scale that is disassembled the purpose of cleaning and repairing Divots and bearings this activity covers cleaning and packi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT