Skinner v Geary
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1931 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
77 cases
-
Feather Supplies Ltd v Ingham
...7 Mr. Ground has put forward a sustained argument before us relying on the cases — we knew them well years ago — which culminated in Skinner v. Geary (1931) 2 K. B. 546. It was decided in those cases — by a beneficial pie of judicial legislation — that a statutory tenant is only entitled to......
-
Haines v Herbert
...purposes, each part) was used on the25th December 1962 when the long lease expired. 16 Mr Wellings, relying upon the cases following Skinner v. Geary which lay down that the Rent Restrictions Acts are for the purpose of protecting occupying tenants, has sought to persuade us, as he persuade......
-
Cove v Flick
...rights have been affected and, as the father, mother and the sister arestill there and desire to remain in occupation, the principle of Skinner v. Geary cannot be relied on; and in some way their occupation ought to be regarded as the occupation of the tenant and their home protected as if ......
- Schon v Camden London Borough Council
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
PAN ASIAN AFRICAN CO. LTD. V. NICON
...come up before the Court in the earlier cases of Reidy v. Walker (1933) 2 K.B. 266 Haskin v. Lewis (1931) 2 K.B. 1 35 Skinner v. Geary (1931) 2 K.B. 546 Haskin v. Lewis established clearly that the principle of the Act is to protect a resident in a dwelling house not to protect a person who......