Slater v Spreag
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1936 |
| Year | 1936 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Singh v Persaud
...the benefit of, his estate, save in a few exceptional cases. The rights of action which survive include claims for pain and suffering [ Slater v. Spreag, [1936] 1 K.B. 83] and for loss of expectation of life [ Rose v. Ford, [1937] 3 All E.R. 359 and Benham v. Gambling, [1941] 1 All E.R. ......
- Nankissoor Singh v Persaud
-
Oliver v Ashman
...estate, by Holding that Benham v. Gambling only binds us in the latter case. And they rely on the opinion of Mr. Justice KacKinnon in Slater v. Spread 1936, 1 King's Bench, page 885, where he indicated that it was the wording of Section 1 (2)(c) of the Act of 1954 which made it impossible t......
-
West (H.) & Son Ltd v Shephard
...not on two grounds. One ground was that there was no mental suffering in such a case and this was the ground adopted by MacKinnon, J. in Slater v. Spreag [1936] 1 K.B. 83 at page 89, and Humphreys, J. in Rose v. Ford [1937] A.C. 826 at page 828. This amounted to a denial that there was any ......
Request a trial to view additional results