Slazenger & Sons v Feltham & Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1889
Date1889
Year1889
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
60 cases
  • Lifestyle 1.99 Pte Ltd v S$1.99 Pte Ltd (trading as ONE.99 SHOP)
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 12 April 2000
    ...bottles, also prominently displaying the figures `1001`. An injunction was granted against the defendant.Slazenger & Sons v Feltham & Co [1889] 6 RPC 531 should similarly be distinguished because the use of the words `The Demon` on a tennis racquet must clearly be fanciful.Perhaps, to the p......
  • Asic v National Exchange Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • L'Oréal SA and Others v Bellure NV (Case C-487/07)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 May 2010
    ...should we be astute to say that (the defendant) cannot succeed in doing what he is straining every nerve to do?” ( Slazenger v Feltham (1889) 6 RPC 531 at 98 However in this case there was other evidence besides that of designer's intent. L'Oréal conducted market research. It was conducted ......
  • British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc v Sky Home Services Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 8 December 2006
    ..."be astute to say that he cannot succeed in doing that which he is straining every nerve to do": see Slazenger & Sons v. Feltham & Co. (1889) 6 R.P.C. 531 at page 538 per Lindley L.J." Mr. Pollock accepted this as a matter of principle but said that it could have no application to this case......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT