Smeaton Hanscomb & Company Ltd v Sassoon I. Setty, Son & Company (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1953 |
| Year | 1953 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
65 cases
-
Penguin Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd v Titan Logistics (S) Pte Ltd (Pioneer Offshore Enterprises Pte Ltd, Third Party)
...the cloak of a general exemption clause: see The Cap Palos. [Emphasis mine.] Smeaton Hanscomb & Co Ltd v Setty (Sassoon I) Son & Co [1953] 2 All ER 1471 concerned a contract for the sale of mahogany logs. The contract had a limitation clause which provided that `any claim must be made withi......
-
Carter (John) (Fine Worsteds) Ltd v Hanson Haulage (Leeds) Ltd
...to which the clause is admittedly designed and apt to apply. 72 In Smeaton Hanscomb & Co. Ltd. v. Sassoon I. Setty, Son & Co., (1953) 1 W. L. R. 1468 at p. 1470, Mr. Justice Devlin said: "I do not think that what is a fundamental term has ever been "closely defined. It must be something, I......
-
Karsales (Harrow) Ltd v Wallis
...v. Railway Executive 1951 2 King's Bench, page 682) and ( Smeaton Hanecomb & Company v. Sassoon I. Setty son & Company 1953 2 All EnglandReports, page 1468), and the recent case in this Court of ( J. Spurling Limited v. Bradshaw 1956 1 Weekly Law Reports, page 461), and the cases there ment......
-
Pepys v London Transport Executive
...as my Lord has said, went too far. In that case this Court did not have its attention drawn to the decision in Smeaton Hanscomb & Co. Ltd. v. Sassoon I. Setty Son & Co. (No. 2) (1953) 1 W.L.R. 1481, and Lewis v. Haverfordwest Rural District Council (1953) 1 W.L.R. 1486, respectively decided......
Request a trial to view additional results