Smith-Bird v Blower

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1939
Date1939
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Davies v Sweet
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 1 December 1961
    ...that case so interpreted or in Lovesy v. Palmer anything to justify the distinction stated in the passage quoted from the Judgment in Smith-Bird v. Blower. Those cases decide that to satisfy the statute the agreement or memorandum must name or identify two parties who are contractually boun......
  • Balabel v Air India
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 March 1988
    ...the privilege, but Lord Justice Brett (at page 683) and Lord Justice Cotton (at pages 684 and 685) refer only to legal advice. 45 In Smith-Bird v. Blower [1939] 2 A.E.R. 406 the defendant agreed to sell property to an agent of the plaintiff's and gave him a note to that effect. The agent pr......
  • Meridian Investment Corporation et Al v Jamaica Export Credit Insurance Corporation et Al
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 9 October 1987
    ...answer to an inquiry made by the solicitor.” 49 In short not everything written to or by the legal adviser is entitled to privilege: Smith Bird v Blower [1939] 2 All E.R. 406. Letter written to solicitor not to obtain legal advice but to inform him of a fact. 50 To be protected the communic......
  • Lee Christina v Lee Eunice and another (executors of the estate of Lee Teck Soon)
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 3 August 1993
    ... ... Notwithstanding that it was a note addressed to her solicitors, it is a sufficient memorandum evidencing the sale. In Smith-Bird v Blower , the defendant offered two houses for sale by auction but the reserve price was not reached. Later the plaintiffs authorized their ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Agency
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Laws of Nigeria. Volume 1 Agency
    • 8 September 2016
    ...is the clear and unequivocal election by the other contracting party to look to the principal alone. See: Skith – Bird v. Blower (1939) 2 All E.R. 406 as per Luxmore L.J. Also, in the words of Lord Reid, in Basma v. Weekes 1950 A.C. 441: -“an agent who contracts in his own name does not cea......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT