Smith (Nicholas) v DPP (Note)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1992 |
| Date | 1992 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
- DPP v Pearman
- DPP v Brodzky (Note)
-
R Falzarano v The Crown Prosecution Service
...point was taken by the justices themselves on their own initiative. In Smith (Nicholas) v Director of Public Prosecutions (Note —1989) [1992] RTR 413 the justices had failed to make the causal connection between the nervousness of the appellant and the inability to provide a specimen. As St......
-
DPP v Ellen Wyn Grundy
...in every case. That has been made plain in the judgment of Stocker LJ in Smith (Nicholas) v Director of Public Prosecutions (Note —1989) [1992] RTR 413, 419B-C: 'It would seem to me that in the vast majority of cases at least it will be necessary to have some medical or other expert evidenc......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Smith (Ian Philip) v DPP [1990] RTR 17, DC! 496 ............................................... Smith (Nicholas Paul) v DPP [1992] RTR 413, DC! 251 .......... Smith (Robert James), DPP v [1999] EWHC 836, [2000] RTR 341, DC! 54 , 78 . Smith (Roger), R v [1975] AC 476, [1974] 2 WLR 1, [1973] ......
-
Reasonable Excuse
...belief … was not capable of constituting a reasonable excuse …” The answer to (e) was “no”. Appeal allowed. Smith (Nicholas Paul) v DPP [1992] RTR 413, 28 April 1989, QBD (DC) In the absence of medical evidence, nervousness or stress is unlikely to be accepted as a reasonable excuse for fai......