Smith (Paul) Ltd v H. & S. International Holding Inc.

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1991
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
28 cases
3 firm's commentaries
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution Update
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 14 Noviembre 2002
    ...the court may by order - (a) confirm the award or (b) vary the award, or (c) set aside the award in whole or in part.î 3 [1991] 2 Lloyd's Rep 127; [1975] 1 WLR 297 4 Paul Smith Ltd v H&S International Holding Inc 5 CPR rule 26.4 (Stay to allow for settlement of the case) is a procedure ......
  • Commercial Court Enforces ADR Clause
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 5 Noviembre 2002
    ...than an agreement to negotiate which is not enforceable in English law (see also Paul Smith Ltd v H&S International Holding Inc [1991] 2 Lloyd's Rep127 and Courtney & Fairbairn Ltd v Tolaini Brothers (Hotels) Ltd [1975] 1 WLR Colman J held that the ADR clause contained an enforceabl......
  • Singapore High Court’s ruling on overlapping arbitration and jurisdiction clauses
    • Singapore
    • JD Supra Singapore
    • 23 Febrero 2021
    ...by the same tribunal unless the language shows otherwise. The UK Commercial Court in Paul Smith Ltd v H&S International Holding Inc [1991] 2 Lloyd's Rep 127 was faced with completely incompatible arbitration and jurisdiction clauses in the same agreement. While the arbitration clause requir......
7 books & journal articles
  • CHOICE OF LAW FOR ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2012, December 2012
    • 1 Diciembre 2012
    ...Gary Born, International Commercial Arbitration: Commentary and Materials (Kluwer, 2001) at p 412. 66Smith Ltd v H & S International[1991] 2 Lloyd's Rep 127 at 130, per Lord Steyn. See also Loukas Mistelis, “Reality Test: Current State of Affairs in Theory and Practice Relating to ‘Lex Arbi......
  • A PERSISTING ABERRATION: THE MOVEMENT TO ENFORCE AGREEMENTS TO MEDIATE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 Diciembre 2008
    ...Non-determinative procedures included negotiation, mediation, expert appraisal and non-binding rulings from a mediator. 16 [1991] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 127 (“Paul Smith”). 17 The exact wording used in Paul Smith was “conciliation”, but there is little doubt that conciliation is a semantic twin of m......
  • Conflict of Laws
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 Diciembre 2020
    ...Piacenza SpA [2016] 5 SLR 455 at [34]. 201 (2019) 20 SAL Ann Rev 251 at 283–287, paras 11.113–11.126. 202 See para 12.97 above. 203 [1991] 2 Lloyd's Rep 127. 204 [2020] 1 SLR 1043. 205 BXH v BXI [2020] 1 SLR 1043 at [5]. 206 BXH v BXI [2020] 1 SLR 1043 at [8], [9] and [52]. 207 BXH v BXI [2......
  • SEPARABILITY, COMPETENCE-COMPETENCE AND THE ARBITRATOR’S JURISDICTION IN SINGAPORE†
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1995, December 1995
    • 1 Diciembre 1995
    ...to the initial existence of the agreement from which jurisdiction is said to derive. 28 Supra, n 20, at 85. 29 Ibid, at 81 col 1. 30 [1991] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 127. See Carl M Svernlöv, “The Evolution of the Doctrine of Separability in England: Now Virtually Complete?”(1992) 9 JIA 115. 31 Ibid, a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT