Smith v Churchwardens Company, of Birmingham

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1888
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Almond v Ash Brothers & Heaton Ltd ; Dawkins (Valuation Officer) v Ash Bros & Heaton Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 26 March 1969
    ...That would be to contradict the hypothesis which you are bound to assume." 11 His decision was affirmed by the Court of Appeal (1889) 22 Q.B.D. 703 where Coleridge C.J. at page 705 said: "In this case we have to do what Courts have from time to time in such cases complained of hav......
  • Agrila Ltd. And Others v Comissioner Of Rating And Valuation
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 16 December 1999
    ...whether, if attention had been directed to it, such a gloss would or would not have been acceptable. Smith v. Birmingham (Churchwardens), 22 Q.B.D. 703 does not, in my opinion, help on this It is conceded, as I think it must be, that if the state or construction of some hereditament was suc......
  • Agrila Ltd. And Others v Comissioner Of Rating And Valuation
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 16 December 1999
    ...whether, if attention had been directed to it, such a gloss would or would not have been acceptable. Smith v. Birmingham (Churchwardens), 22 Q.B.D. 703 does not, in my opinion, help on this It is conceded, as I think it must be, that if the state or construction of some hereditament was suc......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT