Smith v Churchwardens Company, of Birmingham
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1888 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Telereal Trillium v Kevin Hewitt (Valuation Officer)
...can and the man who wants to pay as little as he can, would be arrived at under such circumstances.” ( Smith v The Churchwardens and Overseers of the Poor of the Parish of Birmingham (1888) 22 QBD 211, 219 per Wills J) In similar terms in Robinson Bros (Brewers) Ltd v Houghton and Chester-l......
-
Almond v Ash Brothers & Heaton Ltd ; Dawkins (Valuation Officer) v Ash Bros & Heaton Ltd
...will continue for more than a year, but which is liable to be put an end to by notice." 9 In Smith v. Birmingham Church Wardens (1888) 22 Q.B.D. 211 Wills J. at page 219 said: "It is to no purpose to say that such property cannot in practice be let by the year: no more can railways, canals,......
-
Decision Nº LC-2021-478. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 25-01-2023 , [2023] UKUT 17 (LC)
...he can, would be arrived at under such circumstances.” (Smith v The Churchwardens and Overseers of the Poor of the Parish of Birmingham (1888) 22 QBD 211, 219 per Wills J) In similar terms in Robinson Bros (Brewers) Ltd v Houghton and Chester-le-Street Assessment Committee [1937] KB 445, 47......
-
Telereal Trillium v Kevin Hewitt (Valuation Officer)
...which Wills J said in one of the early leading cases ( Smith v The Churchwardens and Overseers of the Poor of the Parish of Birmingham (1888) 22 QBD 211, at 219): “The Act of Parliament requires the assumption of a tenancy from year to year to be made, and you can no more impugn the hypothe......