Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Smith v Croft (No. 2)

Weekly Law Reports The Law Reports Cited in 98 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1987
Date1987
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
72 cases
11 books & journal articles
  • Shareholders: Majority Rule and Minority Rights under Bermuda Company Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Offshore Commercial Law in Bermuda - 2nd Edition Part II. Establishing offshore vehicles
    • 30 August 2018
    ...analysis, including an assessment of the potential damage to the company’s reputation and share price. 72 Smith v Croft (No 2) [1988] Ch 114. 73 Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461. 74 Burland v Earle [1902] AC 83, 93. 8.72 Further, the principle of majority rule entails that the will of the......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Offshore Commercial Law in Bermuda - 2nd Edition Preliminary Sections
    • 30 August 2018
    ...Co & Others v Al Amana Insurance & Reinsurance Co Ltd [1994] Bda LR 30, Sup Ct of Bermuda 16.65, 22.28, 22.33 Smith v Croft (No 2) [1988] Ch 114, [1987] 3 WLR 405, [1987] 3 All ER 909 8.69 Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd [1967] 2 QB 786, [1967] 2 WLR 1020, [1967] 1 All ER 518......
  • Bibliografie
    • South Africa
    • Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2004-36, January 2004
    • 1 January 2004
    ...v Cox Bros & Co (Maidenhead) Ltd [1927] 2 KB 9(CA)Smith v Croft (No 1) (1986) 2 BCC 99,010Smith v Croft (No 2) [1987] BCLC 206; [1988] Ch 114; [1987] 3 AllER 909Smith v Croft (No 3) (1987) 3 BCC 218Vujnovich v Vujnovich [1990] BCLC 227Wallersteiner v Moir (No 2) [1975] QB 373 (CA)XYZ Ltd, R......
  • Pure corporate control in South Africa : chapter 3 : part two : South Africa on corporate control
    • South Africa
    • Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2010-46, January 2010
    • 1 January 2010
    ...authority on section 424, the court reasoned that it was necessary to 232 Companies Act 61 of 1973: section 228.233 Smith v Croft (No 2) [1988] Ch. 114.234 Powertech Industries Ltd v Mayberry and Another 1996 (2) SA 742 (W): 749D-I.235 Companies Act 61 of 1973.236 Companies Act 61 of 1973: ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT