Smith v Lambeth Assessment Committee

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Year1882
Date1882

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • British and Malayan Trustees Ltd; Tan Lian Chye v; Re Tan Tye, deceased
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • R (Edison First Power Ltd) v Central Valuation Officer
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 10 April 2003
    ...can be doubted. The cases cited by Simon Brown LJ in paragraphs 30-32 of his judgment are good authority for it: Smith & Son v Lambeth Assessment Committee (1882) 9 QBD 585 at 593; Westminster City Council v Southern Railway Co [1936] AC 511 at 565; Brook v National Coal Board [1975] RA 3......
  • Westminster City Council v Southern Railway Company
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 May 1936
    ...appealed, should be included. All three Judges regarded the case as covered by the authority of Smith v. Lambeth Assessment Committee, 9 Q.B.D. 585 and 10 Q.B.D. 327; but MacKinnon J. indicated that but for that authority he would have been inclined to answer in the other sense. Sir Franci......
  • Milford Haven Conservancy Board v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 26 March 1976
    ...assessment is not permitted. So where a tenant is assessed to rates the landlord is not to be assessed too. ( ( Smith -v- Lambeth Assessment Committee 9 Q.B.D. p. 585 at p. 593); ( Westminster -v- Southern Railway 1936 A.C. p. 511 at p. 20Now it is clear that dues levied on vessels entering......
  • Get Started for Free