Smith v McInerney
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1994 |
| Year | 1994 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
S v S (Arbitral Award: Approval) [Family Division]
...to it. In propounding that formulation I adopted the language used by Ormrod LJ in Edgar v Edgar in preference to that of Thorpe J in Smith v McInerney [1994] 2 FLR 1077. I said that Thorpe J's references to "the most exceptional circumstances" and "overwhelmingly strong considerations" see......
-
SJ CCS 2717 2013
...to emphasise, both the government and the courts have encouraged “private ordering” in family law matters (see eg Smith v McInerney [1994] 2 FLR 1077 at 1081A per Thorpe J (as he then was)). The policy reasons for so doing need not be explored here; suffice to say that the principle of priv......
-
Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino
...which she had entered into under great pressure and which failed to make adequate provision for her needs. 41 In Smith v McInerney [1994] 2 FLR 1077 the husband, who had entered into a separation agreement with his wife, sought a lump sum and property adjustment order when his circumstances......
- X v X (Y and Z Intervening)
Request a trial to view additional results