Smith v R
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1877 |
| Year | 1877 |
| Date | 1877 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Ridge (A.P.) v Baldwin and Others
...approved the principles laid down in Cooper's case. 15 The principle was applied in different circumstances in Smith v. The Queen, 3 App. Cas. 614. That was an action of ejectment on the alleged forfeiture of a Crown lease in Queensland. The Governor was entitled to forfeit the lease if it ......
-
Ridge v Baldwin
... ... Rex v. Gaskin F43 arose out of the dismissal of a parish clerk and Lord Kenyon C.J. referred to audi alteram partem as one of the first principles of justice. Reg. v. Smith F44 was another case of dismissal of a parish clerk and Lord Denman C.J. held that even personal knowledge of the offence was no substitute for hearing the officer: his explanation might disprove criminal motive or intent and bring forward other facts in mitigation, and in any event delaying to ... ...
-
Smith v Police Commissioner
...v. Wakefield, [1891] A.C. 173; [1886–90] All E.R. Rep. 651, dictum of Lord Halsbury, L.C. followed. (60) Smith v. R.ELR(1878), L.R. 3 App. Cas. 614, applied. (61) Spackman v. Plumstead Dist. Bd. of WorksELR(1885), L.R. 10 App. Cas. 229, dictum of the Earl of Selborne, L.C. applied. (62) Sti......
-
Massy v Rogers
...I. R. 1 Eq. 313; L. R. 4 H. L. Randegger v. HolmesELR L. R. 1 C. P. 679. Pleus v. BakerELR L. R. 16 Eq. 564. Smith v. The QueenELR 3 App. Cas. 614. Reg. v. Archbishop of CanterburyENR 1 E. & E. 545. Reg. v. Cheshire Lines CommitteeELR L. R. 8 Q. B. 344. Reg. v. LittledaleUNK 12 L. R. Ir. 97......
Request a trial to view additional results