Smith v Wood

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date20 January 1813
Date20 January 1813
CourtHigh Court

English Reports Citation: 170 E.R. 1397

IN THE COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS

Smith
and
Wood

[323] Wednesday, Jan. 20, 1813. smith v wood. (A person who having a copy of a libellous caricature, shews it to another on being requested so to do, is not thereby liable to an action for maliciously publishing it.) This was an action for a bbel upon the plaintiff in the shape of a caricature print intituled, " The inside of a parish workhouse with all abuses reformed." A witness stated, that having heard the defendant had a copy of this print, he went to his house, and requested liberty to see it. The defendant thereupon produced it; and pointed out the figure of the plaintiff, and the other persons it ridiculed. (a) Dawes v. Peck, 8 T. K 330 , Button v. Solomonson, 3 Bos. and Pul 584. (6) But where the freight is not paid by the shipper, and the goods are stated in the biH of lading to be shipped by order and on account of the consignee, the action can only be maintained by the latter, Brown v. Hodgson, 2...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Thompson v Solomon and Solomon
    • Bahamas
    • Court of Appeal (Bahamas)
    • 27 May 2011
  • Pope v Coates. Coates, Plaintiff in Error; Pope, Defendant in Error
    • Ireland
    • Exchequer (Ireland)
    • 24 April 1865
    ...Lord Ray. 414. Reg v. LovettENR 9 Car. & P. 462. Ward v. WeekesENR 7 Bing. 211. Parker v. Scott 31 Law Jour., Exch. 331. Smith v. WoodENR 3 Camp. 323. R. v. Burdett 4 B. & Add. 95. Johnson v. Hudson 7 Ad. & Ell. 233, note. Tarpley v. BlakeyENR 2 Bing., N. C. 437. R. v. Harvey and ChapmanENR......
  • Chubb v Westley
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court
    • 14 March 1834
    ...case for the plaintiff, observed, that, after the verdict in the former case, he would not have proceeded with the (a) See Smith v Wood, 3 Camp 323 ; Rex v. Amphlett, 4 B & C 35 ; and Com. Dig. Lib. B. 1. 1310 LANCTJM V. LOVELL 6 CAR. & P. 487, present, but for certain remarks which had fro......
  • Keogh v The Incorporated Dental Hospital of Ireland
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 23 June 1910
    ...T. L. R. 34. (1) 7 A. C. 741. (2) 2 Stark. 63. (3) 14 T. L. R. 430. (4) 32 L. R. Ir. 629. (1) 7 A. C. 741, 788. (1) 2 M. & Rob. 179. (2) 3 Camp. 323. (1) 7 A. C. (2) 28 L. R. Ir. 24, 35. (3) 32 L. R. Ir. 745. (4) [1891] 1 Q. B. 524. (5) [1907] 1 K. B. 371. (6) 14 T. L. R. 430. ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT